BOOPIE MILLER
01/Season by season
5 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | SMU | 32 | 1,122 | 614 | 19.2 | 124 | 206 | 49 | 2 | 84 | 194-412 | 47.1% | 64-156 | 41.0% | 87.1% |
| 2024-25 | SMU | 28 | 818 | 369 | 13.2 | 80 | 155 | 44 | 8 | 62 | 129-311 | 41.5% | 31-91 | 34.1% | 81.6% |
| 2023-24 | Wake Forest | 33 | 1,046 | 500 | 15.2 | 94 | 120 | 45 | 1 | 84 | 173-377 | 45.9% | 34-94 | 36.2% | 83.3% |
| 2022-23 | Central Michigan | 4 | 140 | 74 | 18.5 | 15 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 18 | 27-52 | 51.9% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 77.3% |
| 2021-22 | Central Michigan | 30 | 987 | 394 | 13.1 | 102 | 138 | 34 | 3 | 83 | 144-342 | 42.1% | 32-89 | 36.0% | 77.9% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 5 seasons | 127 | 4,113 | 1,951 | 15.4 | 415 | 640 | 175 | 14 | 331 | 667-1,494 | 44.6% | 164-438 | 37.4% | 83.1% |
02/2024-25 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 5 | vs Tarleton State | W 96–62 | GS | 27 | 21 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 8-15 | 3-7 | 2-3 |
| NOV 8 | vs Florida A&M | W 102–73 | GS | 31 | 20 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7-13 | 2-4 | 4-5 |
| NOV 12 | vs UNC Greensboro | W 81–68 | GS | 28 | 21 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7-16 | 2-6 | 5-7 |
| NOV 16 | @ Butler | L 70–81 | GS | 30 | 17 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7-19 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| NOV 19 | vs Prairie View A&M | W 110–69 | GS | 19 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6-11 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| NOV 23 | vs Mississippi State | L 79–84 | GS | 28 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3-9 | 0-4 | 6-6 |
| NOV 27 | vs California Baptist | W 79–77 | GS | 29 | 16 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6-14 | 1-4 | 3-4 |
| NOV 28 | @ Washington State | W 77–60 | GS | 31 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 9-10 |
| DEC 4 | vs Alabama State | W 101–72 | GS | 22 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-12 | 0-7 | 2-3 |
| DEC 7 | vs Virginia | W 63–51 | GS | 29 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3-9 | 0-5 | 3-3 |
| DEC 14 | vs LSU | W 74–64 | GS | 28 | 9 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3-11 | 1-4 | 2-2 |
| DEC 21 | @ Boston College | W 103–77 | GS | 30 | 18 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-15 | 1-3 | 3-5 |
| DEC 29 | vs Longwood | W 98–82 | GS | 31 | 24 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6-7 | 2-2 | 10-12 |
| JAN 4 | vs Duke | L 62–89 | GS | 36 | 21 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8-18 | 3-5 | 2-2 |
| JAN 8 | @ North Carolina | L 67–82 | GS | 26 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3-15 | 0-2 | 3-4 |
| JAN 11 | vs Georgia Tech | W 93–71 | GS | 21 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2-7 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| JAN 16 | @ Virginia | W 54–52 | GS | 34 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-14 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| JAN 18 | @ Miami | W 117–74 | GS | 28 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7-11 | 3-5 | 1-2 |
| JAN 22 | vs Louisville | L 73–98 | GS | 23 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2-12 | 1-1 | 2-2 |
| JAN 25 | @ NC State | W 63–57 | GS | 33 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-8 | 0-2 | 1-1 |
| JAN 30 | vs California | W 76–65 | GS | 31 | 13 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 4-10 | 1-1 | 4-4 |
| FEB 1 | vs Stanford | W 85–61 | GS | 31 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| FEB 6 | @ Virginia Tech | W 81–75 | GS | 24 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 5-6 |
| FEB 12 | vs Pittsburgh | W 83–63 | GS | 31 | 13 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4-6 | 2-3 | 3-4 |
| MAR 5 | vs Syracuse | W 77–75 | GS | 35 | 11 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-9 | 0-1 | 3-6 |
| MAR 8 | @ Florida State | L 69–76 | GS | 36 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7-11 | 1-3 | 1-1 |
| MAR 13 | vs Syracuse | W 73–53 | GS | 30 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-3 | 4-4 |
| MAR 14 | @ Clemson | L 54–57 | GS | 36 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5-11 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.