BOOPIE MILLER
01/Season by season
5 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | SMU | 32 | 1,122 | 614 | 19.2 | 124 | 206 | 49 | 2 | 84 | 194-412 | 47.1% | 64-156 | 41.0% | 87.1% |
| 2024-25 | SMU | 28 | 818 | 369 | 13.2 | 80 | 155 | 44 | 8 | 62 | 129-311 | 41.5% | 31-91 | 34.1% | 81.6% |
| 2023-24 | Wake Forest | 33 | 1,046 | 500 | 15.2 | 94 | 120 | 45 | 1 | 84 | 173-377 | 45.9% | 34-94 | 36.2% | 83.3% |
| 2022-23 | Central Michigan | 4 | 140 | 74 | 18.5 | 15 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 18 | 27-52 | 51.9% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 77.3% |
| 2021-22 | Central Michigan | 30 | 987 | 394 | 13.1 | 102 | 138 | 34 | 3 | 83 | 144-342 | 42.1% | 32-89 | 36.0% | 77.9% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 5 seasons | 127 | 4,113 | 1,951 | 15.4 | 415 | 640 | 175 | 14 | 331 | 667-1,494 | 44.6% | 164-438 | 37.4% | 83.1% |
02/2023-24 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 7 | vs Elon | W 101–78 | GS | 24 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7-13 | 1-4 | 2-2 |
| NOV 11 | @ Georgia | L 77–80 | GS | 30 | 22 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6-15 | 3-7 | 7-7 |
| NOV 17 | vs Utah | L 70–77 | GS | 25 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| NOV 18 | vs Towson | W 71–61 | GS | 33 | 25 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11-17 | 0-3 | 3-5 |
| NOV 19 | vs LSU | L 80–86 | GS | 36 | 19 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5-11 | 1-2 | 8-8 |
| NOV 24 | vs Charleston Southern | W 71–56 | GS | 34 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5-13 | 0-1 | 4-5 |
| NOV 30 | vs Florida | W 82–71 | GS | 29 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-11 | 0-1 | 3-6 |
| DEC 6 | vs Rutgers | W 76–57 | GS | 33 | 23 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7-14 | 4-8 | 5-7 |
| DEC 10 | vs NJIT | W 83–59 | GS | 33 | 15 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7-12 | 0-2 | 1-2 |
| DEC 19 | vs Delaware State | W 88–59 | GS | 31 | 17 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6-12 | 1-4 | 4-6 |
| DEC 21 | vs Presbyterian | W 91–68 | GS | 29 | 19 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-9 | 3-3 | 4-4 |
| DEC 30 | vs Virginia Tech | W 86–63 | GS | 31 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-14 | 0-1 | 6-6 |
| JAN 3 | @ Boston College | W 84–78 | GS | 24 | 17 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7-9 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
| JAN 6 | vs Miami | W 86–82 | GS | 38 | 27 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10-19 | 3-3 | 4-6 |
| JAN 10 | @ Florida State | L 82–87 | GS | 37 | 21 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 7-16 | 1-5 | 6-6 |
| JAN 13 | vs Virginia | W 66–47 | GS | 38 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5-10 | 1-3 | 3-3 |
| JAN 17 | @ NC State | L 76–83 | GS | 37 | 21 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 3-12 | 0-2 | 15-15 |
| JAN 20 | vs Louisville | W 90–65 | GS | 32 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-1 | 4-4 |
| JAN 23 | @ North Carolina | L 64–85 | GS | 31 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-12 | 0-5 | 1-2 |
| FEB 1 | @ Pittsburgh | L 72–77 | GS | 30 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 3-4 |
| FEB 4 | vs Syracuse | W 99–70 | GS | 32 | 21 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10-14 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| FEB 7 | @ Georgia Tech | W 80–51 | GS | 28 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-8 | 1-2 | 4-4 |
| FEB 10 | vs NC State | W 83–79 | GS | 33 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-9 | 0-1 | 4-6 |
| FEB 13 | @ Duke | L 69–77 | GS | 26 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-7 | 0-3 | 1-1 |
| FEB 17 | @ Virginia | L 47–49 | GS | 27 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
| FEB 21 | vs Pittsburgh | W 91–58 | GS | 31 | 18 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7-12 | 2-4 | 2-2 |
| FEB 24 | vs Duke | W 83–79 | GS | 32 | 15 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-8 | 2-3 | 5-7 |
| FEB 28 | @ Notre Dame | L 65–70 | GS | 39 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7-16 | 1-5 | 1-2 |
| MAR 2 | @ Virginia Tech | L 76–87 | GS | 35 | 21 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8-15 | 2-5 | 3-4 |
| MAR 6 | vs Georgia Tech | L 69–70 | GS | 32 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-11 | 2-3 | 4-5 |
| MAR 9 | vs Clemson | W 81–76 | GS | 28 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-1 | 2-2 |
| MAR 13 | vs Notre Dame | W 72–59 | GS | 35 | 17 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-12 | 1-2 | 4-5 |
| MAR 14 | @ Pittsburgh | L 69–81 | GS | 33 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2-7 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.