KEITH FRAZIER
01/Season by season
5 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | UTEP | 18 | 435 | 187 | 10.4 | 80 | 19 | 8 | 6 | 30 | 66-165 | 40.0% | 37-110 | 33.6% | 75.0% |
| 2016-17 | North Texas | 4 | 75 | 32 | 8.0 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11-31 | 35.5% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 60.0% |
| 2015-16 | SMU | 10 | 279 | 119 | 11.9 | 44 | 19 | 9 | 5 | 16 | 44-98 | 44.9% | 15-41 | 36.6% | 80.0% |
| 2014-15 | SMU | 16 | 445 | 163 | 10.2 | 61 | 23 | 14 | 6 | 19 | 55-123 | 44.7% | 21-64 | 32.8% | 82.1% |
| 2013-14 | SMU | 31 | 473 | 170 | 5.5 | 63 | 28 | 17 | 10 | 34 | 61-152 | 40.1% | 35-92 | 38.0% | 76.5% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 5 seasons | 79 | 1,707 | 671 | 8.5 | 262 | 91 | 49 | 28 | 102 | 237-569 | 41.7% | 115-326 | 35.3% | 78.1% |
02/2014-15 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 15 | vs Lamar | W 93–54 | GS | 21 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 3-3 |
| NOV 18 | @ Gonzaga | L 56–72 | GS | 27 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 1-2 |
| NOV 21 | @ Indiana | L 68–74 | — | 18 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-7 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| NOV 23 | vs Eastern Washington | W 77–68 | GS | 25 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7-8 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| NOV 27 | vs Texas Southern | W 72–59 | GS | 34 | 16 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-9 | 3-8 | 5-5 |
| DEC 1 | vs Monmouth | W 63–51 | GS | 28 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-6 | 0-5 | 2-2 |
| DEC 6 | vs Wyoming | W 66–53 | GS | 25 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| DEC 9 | vs UC Santa Barbara | W 80–73 | GS | 40 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-12 | 4-8 | 4-4 |
| DEC 18 | vs UIC | W 67–46 | GS | 28 | 16 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 5-7 |
| DEC 20 | @ Michigan | W 62–51 | GS | 32 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-10 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| DEC 30 | vs Midwestern State | W 70–61 | GS | 34 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5-9 | 2-3 | 2-2 |
| DEC 31 | vs South Florida | W 83–49 | GS | 15 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-6 | 2-3 | 4-4 |
| JAN 3 | @ Cincinnati | L 50–56 | GS | 27 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2-8 | 0-3 | 1-3 |
| JAN 9 | vs Memphis | W 73–59 | GS | 31 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5-11 | 1-3 | 1-1 |
| JAN 11 | @ UCF | W 70–61 | GS | 29 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3-10 | 0-3 | 1-2 |
| JAN 15 | @ Temple | W 60–55 | GS | 31 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-3 | 3-4 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.