LANDRY NNOKO
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Clemson | 31 | 691 | 251 | 8.1 | 178 | 26 | 6 | 71 | 48 | 101-183 | 55.2% | 0-0 | — | 63.6% |
| 2014-15 | Clemson | 31 | 753 | 236 | 7.6 | 167 | 21 | 6 | 63 | 47 | 95-187 | 50.8% | 0-0 | — | 65.7% |
| 2013-14 | Clemson | 31 | 859 | 196 | 6.3 | 193 | 11 | 12 | 58 | 31 | 80-146 | 54.8% | 0-0 | — | 56.3% |
| 2012-13 | Clemson | 26 | 180 | 31 | 1.2 | 36 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 15 | 12-31 | 38.7% | 0-0 | — | 87.5% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 119 | 2,483 | 714 | 6.0 | 574 | 59 | 26 | 200 | 141 | 288-547 | 52.7% | 0-0 | — | 63.0% |
02/2015-16 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 14 | vs North Carolina Central | W 74–40 | GS | 21 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 5-6 |
| NOV 15 | vs UTSA | W 78–45 | GS | 26 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-3 |
| NOV 20 | vs Texas Southern | W 76–56 | GS | 18 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 3-5 |
| NOV 24 | vs Massachusetts | L 65–82 | GS | 22 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| NOV 26 | @ Rutgers | W 76–58 | GS | 29 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 2-5 |
| DEC 1 | @ Minnesota | L 83–89 | GS | 23 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| DEC 3 | vs South Carolina Upstate | W 76–56 | GS | 20 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| DEC 6 | vs Wofford | W 66–51 | GS | 15 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 2-4 |
| DEC 13 | vs Alabama | L 50–51 | — | 24 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7-9 | 0-0 | 1-3 |
| DEC 16 | vs Presbyterian | W 69–41 | — | 20 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| DEC 19 | vs South Carolina | L 59–65 | — | 25 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| DEC 22 | @ Georgia | L 48–71 | — | 18 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
| DEC 31 | @ North Carolina | L 69–80 | GS | 15 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| JAN 2 | vs Florida State | W 84–75 | GS | 23 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| JAN 6 | @ Syracuse | W 74–73 | GS | 33 | 19 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-11 | 0-0 | 5-5 |
| JAN 10 | vs Louisville | W 66–62 | GS | 19 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| JAN 14 | vs Duke | W 68–63 | GS | 35 | 12 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| JAN 16 | vs Miami | W 76–65 | GS | 19 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| JAN 20 | @ Virginia | L 62–69 | GS | 27 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-9 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| JAN 28 | vs Pittsburgh | W 73–60 | GS | 21 | 12 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| JAN 30 | @ Florida State | L 65–76 | GS | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 2-5 |
| FEB 3 | @ Wake Forest | W 76–62 | GS | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| FEB 6 | @ Virginia Tech | L 57–60 | GS | 34 | 17 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7-11 | 0-0 | 3-5 |
| FEB 9 | vs Notre Dame | L 83–89 | GS | 28 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 3-4 |
| FEB 13 | vs Georgia Tech | W 66–52 | GS | 24 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| FEB 18 | vs Boston College | W 65–54 | GS | 21 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| FEB 20 | @ NC State | L 74–77 | GS | 23 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 3-4 |
| FEB 24 | @ Georgia Tech | L 73–75 | GS | 19 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| MAR 2 | vs Virginia | L 57–64 | GS | 28 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| MAR 5 | @ Boston College | W 66–50 | — | 23 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 3-4 |
| MAR 10 | vs Georgia Tech | L 85–88 | GS | 19 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.