CARRINGTON LOVE
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Green Bay | 35 | 1,139 | 620 | 17.7 | 97 | 123 | 89 | 10 | 59 | 203-480 | 42.3% | 84-241 | 34.9% | 60.5% |
| 2014-15 | Green Bay | 32 | 1,008 | 327 | 10.2 | 101 | 98 | 50 | 7 | 62 | 107-278 | 38.5% | 37-122 | 30.3% | 69.1% |
| 2013-14 | Green Bay | 30 | 802 | 239 | 8.0 | 81 | 73 | 38 | 5 | 36 | 75-189 | 39.7% | 33-104 | 31.7% | 71.8% |
| 2012-13 | Green Bay | 27 | 415 | 65 | 2.4 | 38 | 42 | 14 | 4 | 31 | 22-66 | 33.3% | 2-18 | 11.1% | 67.9% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 124 | 3,364 | 1,251 | 10.1 | 317 | 336 | 191 | 26 | 188 | 407-1,013 | 40.2% | 156-485 | 32.2% | 65.2% |
02/2012-13 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 10 | vs Chicago State | W 72–67 | — | 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| NOV 21 | @ Idaho | L 62–72 | — | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| NOV 25 | vs North Dakota State | W 74–59 | — | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 1 | @ Virginia | L 51–67 | — | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| DEC 7 | @ Tennessee Tech | L 68–74 | — | 23 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 0-2 |
| DEC 13 | @ Wisconsin | L 54–65 | — | 16 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 16 | vs Southern Illinois | L 70–72 | — | 24 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| DEC 20 | vs Marquette | W 49–47 | GS | 20 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| DEC 23 | vs South Dakota | W 72–55 | GS | 23 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
| DEC 30 | vs Illinois-Springfield | no result on record | GS | 25 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| JAN 4 | @ Wright State | L 53–64 | GS | 18 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 5 | @ Detroit Mercy | L 76–84 | — | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| JAN 10 | vs Loyola Chicago | W 58–45 | — | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 12 | vs UIC | W 53–47 | — | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| JAN 18 | vs Youngstown State | W 67–58 | — | 25 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 5-7 |
| JAN 19 | vs Cleveland State | W 77–50 | — | 14 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 3-4 |
| JAN 24 | @ Valparaiso | L 61–73 | — | 21 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 26 | @ Milwaukee | W 74–54 | — | 18 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| FEB 1 | @ UIC | L 57–60 | — | 24 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| FEB 2 | @ Loyola Chicago | W 73–65 | — | 16 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| FEB 8 | vs Wright State | L 68–70 | — | 21 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| FEB 9 | vs Detroit Mercy | W 68–59 | — | 13 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
| FEB 16 | @ Cleveland State | W 66–59 | — | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
| FEB 17 | @ Youngstown State | W 71–54 | — | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| FEB 24 | @ Drake | L 54–71 | — | 15 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| FEB 27 | vs Milwaukee | W 78–61 | — | 11 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| MAR 2 | vs Valparaiso | L 56–75 | — | 9 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.