JUSTIN PIPPEN
01/Season by season
2 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | California | 30 | 929 | 428 | 14.3 | 117 | 135 | 55 | 19 | 72 | 126-338 | 37.3% | 51-156 | 32.7% | 82.2% |
| 2024-25 | Michigan | 28 | 185 | 44 | 1.6 | 20 | 16 | 6 | 1 | 9 | 12-44 | 27.3% | 8-30 | 26.7% | 85.7% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 2 seasons | 58 | 1,114 | 472 | 8.1 | 137 | 151 | 61 | 20 | 81 | 138-382 | 36.1% | 59-186 | 31.7% | 82.5% |
02/2025-26 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 4 | vs Cal State Bakersfield | W 87–60 | GS | 35 | 15 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5-10 | 1-5 | 4-8 |
| NOV 7 | vs Wright State | W 77–67 | GS | 33 | 14 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3-12 | 0-4 | 8-8 |
| NOV 11 | vs Cal State Fullerton | W 93–65 | GS | 29 | 14 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2-8 | 1-3 | 9-11 |
| NOV 14 | @ Kansas State | L 96–99 | GS | 27 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4-10 | 1-4 | 5-6 |
| NOV 19 | vs Presbyterian | W 67–57 | GS | 34 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-4 |
| NOV 22 | vs Sacramento State | W 91–67 | GS | 28 | 16 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5-11 | 3-8 | 3-5 |
| NOV 26 | vs UCLA | W 80–72 | GS | 29 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4-10 | 3-6 | 2-2 |
| DEC 3 | vs Utah | W 79–72 | GS | 30 | 23 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8-15 | 3-7 | 4-4 |
| DEC 6 | vs Pacific | W 67–61 | GS | 30 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-8 | 2-5 | 6-7 |
| DEC 10 | vs Dominican (CA) | W 93–71 | GS | 31 | 24 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6-14 | 3-7 | 9-9 |
| DEC 21 | vs Columbia | W 74–56 | GS | 25 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3-8 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| DEC 31 | vs Louisville | L 70–90 | GS | 31 | 17 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5-14 | 3-7 | 4-4 |
| JAN 3 | vs Notre Dame | W 72–71 | GS | 29 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-11 | 3-8 | 3-5 |
| JAN 8 | @ Virginia | L 60–84 | GS | 31 | 17 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 5-12 | 2-5 | 5-6 |
| JAN 10 | @ Virginia Tech | L 75–78 | GS | 31 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4-18 | 1-8 | 2-2 |
| JAN 15 | vs Duke | L 56–71 | GS | 33 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2-11 | 1-5 | 5-7 |
| JAN 17 | vs North Carolina | W 84–78 | GS | 34 | 19 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5-8 | 3-4 | 6-6 |
| JAN 25 | @ Stanford | W 78–66 | GS | 36 | 18 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-14 | 3-7 | 7-8 |
| JAN 29 | @ Florida State | L 61–63 | GS | 31 | 19 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-13 | 4-9 | 5-6 |
| JAN 31 | @ Miami | W 86–85 | GS | 34 | 17 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6-13 | 1-4 | 4-6 |
| FEB 5 | vs Georgia Tech | W 90–85 | GS | 33 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-14 | 1-5 | 4-6 |
| FEB 8 | vs Clemson | L 55–77 | GS | 31 | 19 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6-13 | 2-6 | 5-5 |
| FEB 12 | @ Syracuse | L 100–107 | GS | 30 | 11 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4-10 | 1-4 | 2-2 |
| FEB 14 | @ Boston College | W 86–75 | GS | 22 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-11 | 1-4 | 3-5 |
| FEB 21 | vs Stanford | W 72–66 | GS | 35 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2-10 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
| FEB 26 | vs SMU | W 73–69 | GS | 34 | 24 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8-19 | 2-10 | 6-7 |
| FEB 28 | vs Pittsburgh | L 56–72 | GS | 34 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-11 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| MAR 5 | @ Georgia Tech | W 76–65 | GS | 31 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| MAR 7 | @ Wake Forest | L 73–80 | GS | 30 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5-13 | 2-8 | 5-5 |
| MAR 11 | @ Florida State | L 89–95 | GS | 28 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5-8 | 0-2 | 5-6 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.