WILL SPRADLING
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | Kansas State | 32 | 969 | 251 | 7.8 | 99 | 94 | 44 | 1 | 31 | 76-194 | 39.2% | 48-139 | 34.5% | 72.9% |
| 2012-13 | Kansas State | 26 | 751 | 207 | 8.0 | 65 | 68 | 20 | 3 | 28 | 63-156 | 40.4% | 36-99 | 36.4% | 84.9% |
| 2011-12 | Kansas State | 27 | 844 | 257 | 9.5 | 62 | 79 | 22 | 6 | 43 | 76-218 | 34.9% | 40-122 | 32.8% | 81.3% |
| 2010-11 | Kansas State | 32 | 691 | 208 | 6.5 | 55 | 62 | 28 | 1 | 39 | 60-149 | 40.3% | 38-102 | 37.3% | 82.0% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 117 | 3,255 | 923 | 7.9 | 281 | 303 | 114 | 11 | 141 | 275-717 | 38.4% | 162-462 | 35.1% | 79.9% |
02/2011-12 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 12 | vs Charleston Southern | W 72–67 | GS | 25 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-4 | 8-9 |
| NOV 15 | vs Loyola Chicago | W 74–61 | GS | 35 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 5-6 |
| NOV 23 | vs Maryland Eastern Shore | W 92–50 | GS | 18 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-6 | 1-4 | 2-3 |
| DEC 2 | vs George Washington | W 69–56 | GS | 28 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-12 | 2-6 | 2-3 |
| DEC 4 | @ Virginia Tech | W 69–61 | GS | 38 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2-8 | 2-4 | 3-4 |
| DEC 9 | vs West Virginia | L 80–85 | GS | 39 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6-11 | 4-8 | 0-0 |
| DEC 11 | vs North Florida | W 79–68 | GS | 41 | 12 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3-12 | 2-5 | 4-5 |
| DEC 18 | vs Alabama | W 71–58 | GS | 28 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| DEC 31 | vs Howard | W 82–46 | GS | 18 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-8 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| JAN 5 | @ Kansas | L 49–67 | GS | 33 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| JAN 7 | vs Missouri | W 75–59 | GS | 31 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-8 | 3-6 | 3-4 |
| JAN 11 | vs Baylor | L 73–75 | GS | 35 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1-5 | 1-4 | 2-2 |
| JAN 14 | @ Oklahoma | L 73–82 | GS | 32 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4-15 | 3-12 | 0-0 |
| JAN 19 | vs Texas | W 84–80 | GS | 35 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-9 | 1-1 | 4-6 |
| JAN 21 | @ Oklahoma State | W 66–58 | GS | 24 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 6-8 |
| JAN 26 | @ Texas Tech | W 69–47 | GS | 22 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-5 | 0-3 | 2-2 |
| JAN 29 | vs Oklahoma | L 60–63 | GS | 34 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-10 | 0-5 | 2-2 |
| FEB 1 | @ Iowa State | L 70–72 | GS | 37 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| FEB 4 | vs Texas A&M | W 64–53 | GS | 36 | 19 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5-8 | 4-5 | 5-5 |
| FEB 8 | vs Texas Tech | W 65–46 | GS | 38 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0-5 | 0-2 | 10-10 |
| FEB 11 | @ Texas | L 64–75 | GS | 24 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-8 | 3-7 | 2-2 |
| FEB 14 | vs Kansas | L 53–59 | GS | 35 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-13 | 0-5 | 2-3 |
| FEB 18 | @ Baylor | W 57–56 | GS | 35 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-10 | 1-7 | 0-0 |
| FEB 22 | @ Missouri | W 78–68 | GS | 33 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| FEB 25 | vs Iowa State | L 61–65 | GS | 29 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-9 | 0-5 | 0-0 |
| FEB 29 | @ Texas A&M | W 76–70 | GS | 39 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| MAR 3 | vs Oklahoma State | W 77–58 | GS | 22 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.