DANE ERIKSTRUP
01/Season by season
3 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Washington State | 33 | 863 | 400 | 12.1 | 141 | 51 | 34 | 28 | 57 | 141-288 | 49.0% | 60-162 | 37.0% | 74.4% |
| 2023-24 | Eastern Washington | 32 | 606 | 346 | 10.8 | 106 | 50 | 24 | 17 | 45 | 111-257 | 43.2% | 39-114 | 34.2% | 87.6% |
| 2022-23 | Eastern Washington | 32 | 435 | 202 | 6.3 | 96 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 31 | 70-156 | 44.9% | 19-53 | 35.8% | 74.1% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 3 seasons | 97 | 1,904 | 948 | 9.8 | 343 | 118 | 68 | 52 | 133 | 322-701 | 45.9% | 118-329 | 35.9% | 79.8% |
02/2023-24 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 7 | @ Utah | L 66–101 | GS | 16 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-7 | 3-6 | 2-2 |
| NOV 11 | @ Ole Miss | L 64–75 | — | 20 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 6-7 |
| NOV 12 | @ Cincinnati | L 73–85 | — | 18 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-10 | 1-6 | 0-0 |
| NOV 18 | @ Stanford | L 70–95 | — | 13 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| NOV 23 | vs Walla Walla | W 97–46 | — | 18 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-8 | 1-4 | 1-1 |
| NOV 28 | @ Washington State | L 72–82 | — | 15 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| NOV 30 | @ USC | L 78–106 | — | 21 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-5 | 2-2 |
| DEC 9 | @ Air Force | W 73–68 | — | 19 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| DEC 14 | vs Portland Bible | W 103–34 | — | 21 | 17 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5-11 | 0-2 | 7-8 |
| DEC 19 | @ Cal Poly | W 62–53 | — | 20 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-9 | 0-3 | 3-3 |
| DEC 22 | @ Washington | L 66–73 | — | 22 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-10 | 3-5 | 2-2 |
| DEC 29 | vs Portland State | W 91–57 | — | 22 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 6-9 | 2-3 | 4-6 |
| DEC 30 | vs Sacramento State | W 87–61 | — | 12 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 3-4 |
| JAN 4 | @ South Dakota | W 93–79 | — | 23 | 32 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 11-19 | 7-12 | 3-4 |
| JAN 6 | vs North Dakota State | W 91–83 | — | 25 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9-12 | 6-7 | 3-3 |
| JAN 14 | @ Idaho | W 79–58 | — | 18 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3-10 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| JAN 19 | @ Weber State | W 80–78 | — | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 21 | @ Idaho State | W 79–67 | — | 22 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 26 | vs Northern Colorado | W 77–74 | — | 20 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-13 | 0-4 | 6-6 |
| JAN 27 | vs Northern Arizona | W 85–70 | — | 18 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3-11 | 1-6 | 3-4 |
| FEB 2 | @ Montana State | L 60–70 | — | 23 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-9 | 0-4 | 3-4 |
| FEB 4 | @ Montana | W 78–65 | — | 23 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 3-4 |
| FEB 6 | @ Portland State | W 90–77 | — | 18 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 7-8 |
| FEB 11 | vs Idaho | W 87–79 | — | 17 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 2-3 |
| FEB 16 | vs Idaho State | W 88–82 | — | 16 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 17 | vs Weber State | L 84–90 | — | 20 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-4 | 8-8 |
| FEB 23 | @ Northern Arizona | L 71–78 | GS | 18 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2-9 | 0-3 | 7-7 |
| FEB 25 | @ Northern Colorado | W 85–76 | — | 20 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| MAR 1 | vs Montana | W 89–79 | — | 18 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| MAR 2 | vs Montana State | W 108–104 | — | 19 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| MAR 5 | @ Sacramento State | W 91–88 | — | 23 | 24 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8-10 | 3-5 | 5-5 |
| MAR 10 | vs Sacramento State | L 69–74 | — | 17 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-6 | 1-4 | 2-2 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.