JAPHET MEDOR
01/Season by season
3 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Fordham | 33 | 1,086 | 448 | 13.6 | 98 | 132 | 53 | 5 | 58 | 126-338 | 37.3% | 51-148 | 34.5% | 82.9% |
| 2023-24 | Fordham | 31 | 728 | 305 | 9.8 | 58 | 71 | 28 | 7 | 53 | 90-271 | 33.2% | 43-128 | 33.6% | 71.9% |
| 2022-23 | UTSA | 29 | 876 | 396 | 13.7 | 98 | 111 | 44 | 7 | 86 | 121-295 | 41.0% | 19-61 | 31.1% | 71.4% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 3 seasons | 93 | 2,690 | 1,149 | 12.4 | 254 | 314 | 125 | 19 | 197 | 337-904 | 37.3% | 113-337 | 33.5% | 75.7% |
02/2022-23 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 8 | vs Trinity (TX) | W 74–47 | GS | 25 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 1-2 |
| NOV 12 | @ Texas A&M-Corpus Christi | L 55–75 | GS | 29 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2-9 | 1-3 | 4-8 |
| NOV 15 | vs St. Mary's (TX) | W 66–59 | GS | 20 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 2-4 |
| NOV 18 | vs Texas State | W 61–56 | GS | 27 | 16 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 6-8 |
| NOV 23 | vs Prairie View A&M | W 82–75 | GS | 36 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 6-10 | 0-1 | 16-20 |
| NOV 26 | vs Grambling | L 55–75 | GS | 31 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 4-8 |
| NOV 28 | vs Dartmouth | L 77–78 | GS | 20 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
| NOV 29 | vs Incarnate Word | W 68–62 | GS | 31 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3-10 | 2-5 | 3-4 |
| DEC 10 | @ New Mexico | L 76–94 | GS | 19 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 14 | @ Utah | L 70–91 | GS | 32 | 23 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 7-18 | 2-5 | 7-9 |
| DEC 23 | vs North Texas | L 54–78 | GS | 36 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-9 | 0-1 | 6-6 |
| DEC 30 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 69–91 | GS | 30 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3-11 | 1-4 | 1-3 |
| DEC 31 | @ UAB | L 67–90 | GS | 35 | 21 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 7-15 | 3-6 | 4-6 |
| JAN 6 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 75–72 | GS | 37 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 7-10 |
| JAN 7 | vs Western Kentucky | L 64–74 | GS | 35 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-15 | 2-8 | 4-4 |
| JAN 12 | @ UTEP | L 57–69 | GS | 35 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 14 | @ Charlotte | L 54–72 | GS | 33 | 18 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-11 | 0-0 | 8-11 |
| JAN 17 | vs Rice | L 81–88 | GS | 42 | 30 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11-21 | 2-3 | 6-8 |
| JAN 28 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 55–66 | — | 8 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| FEB 3 | @ Western Kentucky | L 74–81 | GS | 28 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 4-6 |
| FEB 4 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 60–84 | GS | 27 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2-9 | 0-2 | 4-6 |
| FEB 11 | vs UTEP | L 66–77 | GS | 30 | 20 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 10-10 |
| FEB 17 | @ Rice | W 84–79 | GS | 36 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 4-11 | 0-1 | 6-8 |
| FEB 18 | vs UAB | L 78–83 | GS | 38 | 22 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8-18 | 2-3 | 4-4 |
| FEB 24 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 66–106 | GS | 24 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2-7 | 0-1 | 5-6 |
| FEB 26 | @ Florida International | W 95–91 | GS | 37 | 13 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 4-14 | 0-2 | 5-8 |
| MAR 3 | vs Charlotte | W 78–73 | GS | 35 | 22 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-11 | 1-2 | 9-14 |
| MAR 9 | @ Rice | L 71–72 | GS | 34 | 20 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7-14 | 1-3 | 5-10 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.