POP ISAACS
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Texas A&M | 31 | 693 | 313 | 10.1 | 82 | 81 | 20 | 3 | 51 | 101-235 | 43.0% | 59-149 | 39.6% | 75.4% |
| 2024-25 | Creighton | 8 | 254 | 130 | 16.3 | 38 | 31 | 4 | 1 | 23 | 41-100 | 41.0% | 23-60 | 38.3% | 86.2% |
| 2023-24 | Texas Tech | 33 | 1,080 | 524 | 15.9 | 107 | 116 | 34 | 3 | 83 | 165-465 | 35.5% | 72-239 | 30.1% | 83.6% |
| 2022-23 | Texas Tech | 25 | 716 | 287 | 11.5 | 51 | 67 | 27 | 0 | 57 | 91-247 | 36.8% | 62-164 | 37.8% | 89.6% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 97 | 2,743 | 1,254 | 12.9 | 278 | 295 | 85 | 7 | 214 | 398-1,047 | 38.0% | 216-612 | 35.3% | 82.9% |
02/2025-26 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 4 | vs Northwestern State | W 98–68 | — | 18 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| NOV 7 | vs Texas Southern | W 104–70 | GS | 20 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2-6 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| NOV 9 | @ Oklahoma State | L 63–87 | GS | 24 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-11 | 1-8 | 3-4 |
| NOV 15 | vs UCF | L 74–86 | GS | 25 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-6 | 2-5 | 5-6 |
| NOV 19 | vs Montana | W 86–81 | — | 23 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-7 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| NOV 26 | vs Mississippi Valley State | W 120–84 | — | 19 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-5 | 2-4 | 0-1 |
| NOV 28 | @ Florida State | W 95–59 | — | 21 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-9 | 3-6 | 4-4 |
| DEC 3 | @ Pittsburgh | W 81–73 | — | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| DEC 7 | @ SMU | L 80–93 | — | 24 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-10 | 2-6 | 1-1 |
| DEC 15 | vs Jacksonville | W 112–75 | — | 18 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 21 | vs East Texas A&M | W 118–77 | — | 19 | 15 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-8 | 5-7 | 0-1 |
| DEC 30 | vs Prairie View A&M | W 111–82 | — | 21 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-9 | 3-6 | 0-1 |
| JAN 3 | vs LSU | W 75–72 | — | 23 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-9 | 1-4 | 2-3 |
| JAN 7 | @ Auburn | W 90–88 | — | 29 | 21 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-12 | 4-8 | 3-5 |
| JAN 10 | vs Oklahoma | W 83–76 | — | 20 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 6-6 |
| JAN 14 | @ Tennessee | L 82–87 | — | 34 | 16 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 5-13 | 4-11 | 2-5 |
| JAN 17 | @ Texas | W 74–70 | — | 21 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 22 | vs Mississippi State | W 88–68 | — | 19 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-9 | 2-5 | 2-2 |
| JAN 24 | vs South Carolina | W 92–69 | — | 24 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-9 | 2-7 | 1-2 |
| JAN 31 | @ Georgia | W 92–77 | — | 25 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-8 | 3-6 | 2-2 |
| FEB 5 | @ Alabama | L 97–100 | — | 15 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| FEB 8 | vs Florida | L 67–86 | — | 26 | 17 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-8 | 3-5 | 4-4 |
| FEB 12 | vs Missouri | L 85–86 | — | 13 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| FEB 14 | @ Vanderbilt | L 69–82 | — | 24 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| FEB 19 | vs Ole Miss | W 80–77 | — | 15 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| FEB 22 | @ Oklahoma | W 75–71 | — | 15 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 26 | @ Arkansas | L 84–99 | — | 24 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| FEB 28 | vs Texas | L 70–76 | — | 26 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 4-4 |
| MAR 4 | vs Kentucky | W 96–85 | GS | 29 | 12 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-4 | 5-6 |
| MAR 7 | @ LSU | W 94–91 | GS | 45 | 18 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6-12 | 1-6 | 5-8 |
| MAR 13 | vs Oklahoma | L 63–83 | GS | 26 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-9 | 4-9 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.