MARCUS WATSON
01/Season by season
2 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | North Carolina A&T | 32 | 916 | 453 | 14.2 | 145 | 60 | 27 | 13 | 100 | 165-398 | 41.5% | 44-155 | 28.4% | 77.5% |
| 2021-22 | North Carolina A&T | 29 | 788 | 364 | 12.6 | 173 | 39 | 25 | 14 | 57 | 132-332 | 39.8% | 31-117 | 26.5% | 67.6% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 2 seasons | 61 | 1,704 | 817 | 13.4 | 318 | 99 | 52 | 27 | 157 | 297-730 | 40.7% | 75-272 | 27.6% | 72.5% |
02/2021-22 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 10 | @ UNC Greensboro | L 53–57 | GS | 33 | 17 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6-14 | 1-6 | 4-7 |
| NOV 13 | @ Jacksonville | L 54–63 | GS | 33 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-12 | 2-8 | 1-2 |
| NOV 16 | @ South Florida | L 54–56 | — | 21 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-11 | 2-6 | 2-2 |
| NOV 18 | vs Greensboro College | W 77–69 | GS | 20 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-10 | 1-4 | 2-5 |
| NOV 20 | @ Wake Forest | L 63–87 | GS | 18 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3-10 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| NOV 24 | @ Stanford | L 65–79 | GS | 23 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-9 | 0-5 | 0-0 |
| NOV 26 | vs Samford | L 75–77 | GS | 30 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8-15 | 5-6 | 1-2 |
| NOV 27 | vs St. Francis Brooklyn | W 73–67 | GS | 29 | 28 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10-12 | 3-4 | 5-6 |
| DEC 3 | vs Carver College | W 97–55 | GS | 21 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 8 | @ East Carolina | L 71–82 | GS | 30 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4-14 | 1-6 | 2-3 |
| DEC 11 | @ UCF | L 68–83 | GS | 30 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2-9 | 0-3 | 5-5 |
| DEC 15 | @ East Tennessee State | W 69–67 | GS | 36 | 19 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6-12 | 2-3 | 5-6 |
| DEC 18 | @ Howard | L 57–79 | GS | 30 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-11 | 0-2 | 1-3 |
| DEC 21 | vs Mid-Atlantic Christian | W 88–63 | GS | 23 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5-9 | 0-2 | 3-4 |
| JAN 6 | vs Presbyterian | W 65–57 | GS | 32 | 16 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3-16 | 1-5 | 9-10 |
| JAN 8 | @ Radford | W 73–72 | GS | 37 | 18 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-11 | 0-3 | 6-7 |
| JAN 13 | vs Hampton | W 67–59 | GS | 27 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-13 | 1-5 | 1-3 |
| JAN 16 | @ High Point | L 71–78 | GS | 32 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7-14 | 1-6 | 2-5 |
| JAN 19 | @ UNC Asheville | W 73–71 | GS | 32 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6-18 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| JAN 22 | vs Campbell | L 72–73 | GS | 23 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2-12 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| JAN 27 | @ Longwood | L 71–79 | GS | 23 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 29 | vs South Carolina Upstate | L 64–84 | GS | 30 | 21 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8-19 | 0-4 | 5-10 |
| FEB 4 | @ Winthrop | L 54–64 | GS | 27 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4-9 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| FEB 17 | @ Hampton | L 82–93 | — | 15 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| FEB 19 | @ Campbell | L 63–64 | — | 14 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 3-4 |
| FEB 24 | vs High Point | L 58–78 | — | 25 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 26 | vs Radford | L 53–62 | — | 26 | 15 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6-17 | 1-6 | 2-2 |
| MAR 2 | @ Radford | W 78–71 | GS | 32 | 18 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-11 | 2-3 | 2-6 |
| MAR 4 | @ Longwood | L 65–79 | GS | 36 | 27 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10-17 | 2-7 | 5-6 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.