JAEDEN ZACKERY
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Clemson | 33 | 1,165 | 373 | 11.3 | 108 | 105 | 69 | 3 | 50 | 132-292 | 45.2% | 37-106 | 34.9% | 81.8% |
| 2023-24 | Boston College | 34 | 1,146 | 396 | 11.6 | 113 | 144 | 61 | 3 | 64 | 148-305 | 48.5% | 32-78 | 41.0% | 82.9% |
| 2022-23 | Boston College | 33 | 1,094 | 354 | 10.7 | 104 | 90 | 48 | 5 | 65 | 122-293 | 41.6% | 31-96 | 32.3% | 76.7% |
| 2021-22 | Boston College | 33 | 1,138 | 344 | 10.4 | 106 | 90 | 57 | 6 | 67 | 120-259 | 46.3% | 52-109 | 47.7% | 71.2% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 133 | 4,543 | 1,467 | 11.0 | 431 | 429 | 235 | 17 | 246 | 522-1,149 | 45.4% | 152-389 | 39.1% | 78.3% |
02/2024-25 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 5 | vs Charleston Southern | W 91–64 | GS | 26 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| NOV 13 | vs Eastern Kentucky | W 75–62 | GS | 39 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3-8 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| NOV 17 | @ Boise State | L 71–84 | GS | 24 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 4-4 |
| NOV 22 | vs Radford | W 79–51 | GS | 26 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| NOV 25 | @ San Francisco | W 70–55 | GS | 35 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 1-2 |
| NOV 26 | @ Penn State | W 75–67 | GS | 34 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 2-2 |
| NOV 30 | vs Florida A&M | W 86–58 | GS | 30 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6-11 | 0-3 | 1-1 |
| DEC 4 | vs Kentucky | W 70–66 | GS | 37 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5-12 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| DEC 7 | @ Miami | W 65–55 | GS | 36 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3-8 | 0-5 | 2-2 |
| DEC 14 | vs Memphis | L 82–87 | GS | 42 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3-7 | 3-4 | 2-2 |
| DEC 18 | @ South Carolina | L 88–91 | GS | 33 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-3 | 3-3 |
| DEC 21 | vs Wake Forest | W 73–62 | GS | 35 | 12 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 3-11 | 0-4 | 6-6 |
| JAN 1 | vs Stanford | W 85–71 | GS | 37 | 16 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 6-13 | 0-5 | 4-5 |
| JAN 5 | vs California | W 80–68 | GS | 35 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-8 | 1-4 | 2-2 |
| JAN 8 | @ Louisville | L 64–74 | GS | 33 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 5-11 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| JAN 11 | vs Florida State | W 77–57 | GS | 36 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-8 | 3-4 | 2-2 |
| JAN 15 | @ Georgia Tech | W 70–59 | GS | 33 | 21 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7-12 | 3-5 | 4-4 |
| JAN 18 | @ Pittsburgh | W 78–75 | GS | 41 | 16 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-11 | 2-5 | 4-5 |
| JAN 23 | vs Syracuse | W 86–72 | GS | 38 | 14 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4-9 | 0-2 | 6-7 |
| JAN 25 | @ Virginia Tech | W 72–57 | GS | 38 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-11 | 1-5 | 2-2 |
| FEB 1 | @ NC State | W 68–58 | GS | 34 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| FEB 5 | vs Georgia Tech | L 86–89 | GS | 51 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 1-3 |
| FEB 8 | vs Duke | W 77–71 | GS | 40 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-9 | 1-1 | 1-2 |
| FEB 11 | vs North Carolina | W 85–65 | GS | 33 | 16 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 6-9 | 1-3 | 3-5 |
| FEB 15 | @ Florida State | W 72–46 | GS | 30 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 22 | @ SMU | W 79–69 | GS | 37 | 19 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 6-13 | 5-8 | 2-2 |
| FEB 27 | vs Notre Dame | W 83–68 | GS | 34 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-10 | 0-2 | 1-1 |
| MAR 1 | @ Virginia | W 71–58 | GS | 38 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-10 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| MAR 6 | @ Boston College | W 78–69 | GS | 38 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7-12 | 2-4 | 5-6 |
| MAR 8 | vs Virginia Tech | W 65–47 | GS | 34 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 1-2 |
| MAR 14 | vs SMU | W 57–54 | GS | 36 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 4-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| MAR 15 | @ Louisville | L 73–76 | GS | 38 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3-10 | 0-2 | 5-7 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.