GABE SISK
01/Season by season
3 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | East Tennessee State | 18 | 179 | 61 | 3.4 | 41 | 12 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 21-42 | 50.0% | 1-10 | 10.0% | 90.0% |
| 2024-25 | East Tennessee State | 29 | 377 | 117 | 4.0 | 80 | 20 | 24 | 3 | 19 | 42-106 | 39.6% | 10-49 | 20.4% | 71.9% |
| 2023-24 | East Tennessee State | 27 | 351 | 97 | 3.6 | 55 | 21 | 10 | 2 | 14 | 30-94 | 31.9% | 12-47 | 25.5% | 80.6% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 3 seasons | 74 | 907 | 275 | 3.7 | 176 | 53 | 44 | 6 | 43 | 93-242 | 38.4% | 23-106 | 21.7% | 79.5% |
02/2024-25 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 5 | vs Newberry | W 72–51 | — | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| NOV 9 | vs Eastern Kentucky | L 78–82 | — | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| NOV 14 | vs Tusculum | W 82–54 | — | 22 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| NOV 16 | @ Davidson | L 70–76 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| NOV 23 | vs South Carolina Upstate | W 87–76 | — | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| NOV 24 | vs Queens University | W 82–67 | — | 15 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| NOV 27 | @ Charlotte | W 75–55 | — | 11 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| NOV 30 | vs Austin Peay | W 79–57 | — | 12 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-9 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| DEC 4 | @ James Madison | L 61–71 | — | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| DEC 19 | vs Elon | W 84–58 | — | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 21 | @ Kansas City | L 66–73 | — | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| JAN 1 | vs VMI | W 84–69 | — | 23 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0-5 | 0-4 | 4-4 |
| JAN 4 | vs Wofford | L 78–81 | — | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| JAN 9 | @ Mercer | W 70–68 | — | 29 | 9 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3-9 | 1-2 | 2-4 |
| JAN 11 | vs The Citadel | W 70–52 | — | 26 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-5 | 2-2 |
| JAN 16 | @ Furman | L 70–73 | — | 24 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 3-4 |
| JAN 18 | @ Samford | W 65–60 | — | 15 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-7 | 0-3 | 1-1 |
| JAN 23 | vs Western Carolina | W 85–58 | — | 19 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| JAN 25 | vs Chattanooga | L 63–71 | — | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 30 | @ UNC Greensboro | L 65–70 | — | 12 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
| FEB 2 | vs Furman | W 72–69 | — | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 5 | @ VMI | W 62–55 | — | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| FEB 8 | vs Samford | W 66–59 | — | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| FEB 12 | @ Western Carolina | L 67–76 | — | 15 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5-10 | 0-4 | 2-4 |
| FEB 16 | @ Chattanooga | L 71–78 | — | 16 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| FEB 20 | vs UNC Greensboro | W 65–49 | — | 24 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| FEB 22 | @ Wofford | W 73–68 | — | 18 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 3-6 |
| FEB 26 | vs Mercer | W 59–58 | — | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| MAR 1 | @ The Citadel | W 81–66 | — | 15 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.