TREY BONHAM
01/Season by season
5 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Chattanooga | 33 | 990 | 443 | 13.4 | 138 | 89 | 45 | 10 | 55 | 152-345 | 44.1% | 54-163 | 33.1% | 82.5% |
| 2023-24 | Chattanooga | 22 | 684 | 353 | 16.0 | 110 | 78 | 39 | 7 | 53 | 120-248 | 48.4% | 45-109 | 41.3% | 84.0% |
| 2022-23 | Florida | 29 | 398 | 167 | 5.8 | 55 | 34 | 22 | 1 | 29 | 48-130 | 36.9% | 25-76 | 32.9% | 73.0% |
| 2021-22 | VMI | 28 | 763 | 369 | 13.2 | 123 | 113 | 36 | 3 | 60 | 125-261 | 47.9% | 30-84 | 35.7% | 82.4% |
| 2020-21 | VMI | 24 | 514 | 206 | 8.6 | 66 | 41 | 26 | 1 | 29 | 72-143 | 50.3% | 21-52 | 40.4% | 71.9% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 5 seasons | 136 | 3,349 | 1,538 | 11.3 | 492 | 355 | 168 | 22 | 226 | 517-1,127 | 45.9% | 175-484 | 36.2% | 79.9% |
02/2021-22 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 10 | vs Carlow | W 111–55 | GS | 17 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| NOV 13 | @ Presbyterian | L 72–73 | GS | 29 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 4-6 |
| NOV 17 | vs Keystone | W 97–35 | GS | 13 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-3 | 2-2 | 1-1 |
| NOV 20 | @ Marist | L 74–78 | GS | 20 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2-9 | 0-3 | 1-2 |
| NOV 24 | @ Presbyterian | L 54–59 | GS | 24 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 1-2 |
| DEC 4 | @ Portland | W 90–82 | GS | 24 | 16 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5-10 | 3-5 | 3-4 |
| DEC 5 | @ Seattle U | W 89–82 | GS | 16 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 6-6 |
| DEC 15 | @ Wake Forest | L 70–77 | GS | 25 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| DEC 30 | @ Wofford | W 80–73 | GS | 29 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4-6 | 1-1 | 2-5 |
| JAN 1 | vs Furman | W 76–67 | GS | 25 | 16 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-11 | 4-6 | 2-2 |
| JAN 6 | @ East Tennessee State | L 79–80 | GS | 25 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4-8 | 1-4 | 1-2 |
| JAN 8 | vs UNC Greensboro | L 56–72 | GS | 12 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 14 | @ Mercer | L 91–97 | GS | 20 | 16 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 5-6 |
| JAN 15 | @ The Citadel | W 90–85 | GS | 34 | 17 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7-13 | 1-5 | 2-2 |
| JAN 21 | vs Samford | W 99–80 | GS | 32 | 16 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5-11 | 2-4 | 4-5 |
| JAN 22 | vs Chattanooga | L 74–78 | GS | 27 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 27 | @ Furman | L 64–79 | GS | 29 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 3-4 |
| JAN 29 | vs East Tennessee State | W 83–79 | GS | 33 | 21 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-13 | 1-3 | 6-7 |
| FEB 3 | @ UNC Greensboro | W 76–65 | GS | 28 | 17 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 7-10 |
| FEB 4 | vs Western Carolina | W 76–69 | GS | 32 | 19 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6-10 | 2-4 | 5-6 |
| FEB 11 | vs Mercer | W 85–79 | GS | 33 | 19 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-13 | 2-6 | 7-7 |
| FEB 12 | vs The Citadel | L 79–83 | GS | 36 | 12 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5-15 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| FEB 18 | @ Samford | L 99–100 | GS | 43 | 31 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9-13 | 2-3 | 11-12 |
| FEB 19 | @ Chattanooga | W 80–75 | GS | 37 | 20 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7-14 | 1-4 | 5-5 |
| FEB 24 | vs Wofford | L 72–83 | GS | 35 | 20 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8-19 | 1-6 | 3-3 |
| FEB 27 | @ Western Carolina | L 73–82 | GS | 26 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-11 | 1-5 | 7-7 |
| MAR 5 | @ Wofford | L 66–68 | GS | 37 | 17 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7-10 | 2-3 | 1-1 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.