NICK BOYD
01/Season by season
5 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Wisconsin | 34 | 1,084 | 699 | 20.6 | 128 | 143 | 36 | 1 | 58 | 242-505 | 47.9% | 60-165 | 36.4% | 82.4% |
| 2024-25 | San Diego State | 30 | 895 | 402 | 13.4 | 115 | 119 | 30 | 0 | 54 | 130-312 | 41.7% | 50-140 | 35.7% | 74.8% |
| 2023-24 | Florida Atlantic | 26 | 628 | 247 | 9.5 | 72 | 47 | 23 | 1 | 27 | 79-195 | 40.5% | 41-119 | 34.5% | 84.2% |
| 2022-23 | Florida Atlantic | 33 | 784 | 299 | 9.1 | 136 | 81 | 28 | 1 | 35 | 107-231 | 46.3% | 58-140 | 41.4% | 65.9% |
| 2020-21 | Florida Atlantic | 23 | 345 | 118 | 5.1 | 45 | 42 | 10 | 3 | 19 | 41-97 | 42.3% | 16-40 | 40.0% | 76.9% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 5 seasons | 146 | 3,736 | 1,765 | 12.1 | 496 | 432 | 127 | 6 | 193 | 599-1,340 | 44.7% | 225-604 | 37.3% | 78.6% |
02/2023-24 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 9 | @ Loyola Chicago | W 75–62 | GS | 27 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5-10 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| NOV 15 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 100–57 | GS | 21 | 11 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-9 | 3-7 | 0-0 |
| NOV 18 | vs Bryant | L 52–61 | GS | 27 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2-11 | 1-9 | 3-4 |
| DEC 16 | @ St. Bonaventure | W 64–54 | — | 20 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| DEC 23 | @ Arizona | W 96–95 | — | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 31 | @ Florida Gulf Coast | L 68–72 | — | 18 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| JAN 3 | vs East Carolina | W 79–64 | — | 15 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| JAN 6 | @ Charlotte | L 68–70 | — | 27 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-10 | 1-5 | 6-7 |
| JAN 12 | @ Tulane | W 85–84 | GS | 29 | 21 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7-15 | 6-11 | 1-1 |
| JAN 14 | vs UAB | W 86–73 | GS | 30 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-9 | 0-4 | 3-3 |
| JAN 19 | vs Wichita State | W 86–77 | GS | 29 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-9 | 2-5 | 1-2 |
| JAN 21 | @ UTSA | W 112–103 | GS | 33 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-6 | 3-4 | 1-4 |
| JAN 25 | @ Rice | W 69–56 | GS | 32 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5-6 | 3-4 | 5-5 |
| JAN 28 | vs North Texas | W 66–63 | GS | 33 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-10 | 1-6 | 0-0 |
| FEB 3 | vs Tulsa | W 102–70 | GS | 29 | 13 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3-7 | 3-6 | 4-4 |
| FEB 9 | @ UAB | L 73–76 | GS | 29 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-9 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| FEB 11 | @ Wichita State | W 95–82 | GS | 23 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| FEB 16 | vs Temple | W 80–68 | GS | 26 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-9 | 4-7 | 0-0 |
| FEB 18 | @ South Florida | L 86–90 | GS | 30 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-10 | 2-6 | 2-4 |
| FEB 23 | vs SMU | W 80–70 | — | 18 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 1-1 |
| FEB 25 | @ Memphis | L 74–78 | — | 15 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| MAR 2 | vs Tulane | W 79–73 | — | 26 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-7 | 2-5 | 2-2 |
| MAR 7 | @ North Texas | W 80–76 | — | 19 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 9-10 |
| MAR 9 | vs Memphis | W 92–84 | — | 15 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| MAR 15 | vs North Texas | W 77–71 | — | 21 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 6-6 |
| MAR 16 | vs Temple | L 73–74 | — | 24 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.