TAYLOR BOL BOWEN
01/Season by season
3 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Alabama | 27 | 509 | 167 | 6.2 | 116 | 12 | 11 | 25 | 18 | 52-131 | 39.7% | 24-84 | 28.6% | 81.3% |
| 2024-25 | Florida State | 29 | 723 | 232 | 8.0 | 151 | 24 | 29 | 43 | 42 | 82-172 | 47.7% | 29-70 | 41.4% | 78.0% |
| 2023-24 | Florida State | 31 | 341 | 97 | 3.1 | 82 | 8 | 18 | 15 | 20 | 37-80 | 46.3% | 7-33 | 21.2% | 66.7% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 3 seasons | 87 | 1,573 | 496 | 5.7 | 349 | 44 | 58 | 83 | 80 | 171-383 | 44.6% | 60-187 | 32.1% | 77.0% |
02/2024-25 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 5 | vs Northern Kentucky | W 74–62 | — | 25 | 17 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5-9 | 0-2 | 7-7 |
| NOV 10 | @ Rice | W 73–65 | GS | 30 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-3 | 2-2 |
| NOV 13 | vs Tarleton State | W 72–52 | GS | 19 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-6 |
| NOV 15 | vs Florida | L 74–87 | GS | 24 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| NOV 20 | vs Hofstra | W 79–61 | GS | 18 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 3-4 |
| NOV 22 | vs Temple | W 78–69 | GS | 24 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| NOV 24 | @ Massachusetts | W 92–59 | GS | 18 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| NOV 27 | vs Western Carolina | W 91–57 | GS | 19 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
| DEC 4 | @ LSU | L 75–85 | GS | 24 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| DEC 7 | @ NC State | L 74–84 | GS | 23 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 3-4 |
| DEC 18 | vs Winthrop | W 82–64 | GS | 28 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| DEC 21 | vs Louisville | L 76–90 | GS | 21 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| JAN 4 | vs Syracuse | W 90–74 | GS | 26 | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6-10 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| JAN 9 | @ Miami | W 80–65 | GS | 26 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6-6 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| JAN 11 | @ Clemson | L 57–77 | GS | 23 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| JAN 16 | vs Pittsburgh | W 82–70 | GS | 34 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2-8 | 1-4 | 1-1 |
| JAN 18 | vs Georgia Tech | W 91–78 | GS | 28 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-9 | 3-5 | 3-5 |
| JAN 23 | @ California | L 68–77 | GS | 35 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 26 | @ Stanford | L 71–78 | GS | 32 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| JAN 30 | vs Virginia Tech | L 66–76 | GS | 28 | 14 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6-8 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| FEB 13 | @ Wake Forest | W 72–70 | GS | 24 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-8 | 3-6 | 4-4 |
| FEB 15 | vs Clemson | L 46–72 | GS | 29 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1-10 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 20 | vs Miami | W 74–66 | GS | 27 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| FEB 22 | @ Louisville | L 81–89 | GS | 28 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
| FEB 25 | vs North Carolina | L 85–96 | GS | 21 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 3-3 |
| MAR 2 | @ Duke | L 65–100 | GS | 26 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| MAR 5 | @ Virginia | L 57–60 | GS | 26 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| MAR 8 | vs SMU | W 76–69 | — | 21 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 1-2 |
| MAR 11 | vs Syracuse | L 62–66 | GS | 16 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.