DAEQUON MONTREAL
01/Season by season
2 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Boise State | 32 | 837 | 329 | 10.3 | 167 | 28 | 18 | 14 | 39 | 119-253 | 47.0% | 3-17 | 17.6% | 74.6% |
| 2009-10 | Boise State | 32 | 799 | 344 | 10.8 | 170 | 37 | 17 | 21 | 46 | 132-270 | 48.9% | 10-32 | 31.3% | 66.0% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 2 seasons | 64 | 1,636 | 673 | 10.5 | 337 | 65 | 35 | 35 | 85 | 251-523 | 48.0% | 13-49 | 26.5% | 70.5% |
02/2009-10 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 14 | vs Loyola Marymount | W 90–87 | — | 17 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 3-4 |
| NOV 15 | @ Montana | L 82–95 | — | 26 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| NOV 15 | @ North Dakota | W 75–60 | — | 24 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 3-3 |
| NOV 22 | @ Wyoming | L 61–87 | — | 22 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| NOV 25 | @ Eastern Washington | W 82–69 | — | 23 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 4-6 |
| NOV 29 | vs North Texas | W 79–73 | — | 16 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-1 | 2-2 |
| DEC 6 | @ Illinois | L 77–84 | — | 12 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 10 | @ Idaho State | W 79–67 | — | 20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-3 |
| DEC 13 | vs San Diego | L 56–59 | — | 13 | 12 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 6-9 |
| DEC 19 | vs Houston Christian | W 96–59 | — | 21 | 16 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| DEC 22 | vs Portland State | W 69–62 | — | 21 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 24 | vs Montana State | W 58–56 | — | 7 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
| DEC 30 | vs Northwest Nazarene | no result on record | — | 16 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
| JAN 3 | @ Fresno State | L 68–71 | — | 29 | 24 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-8 | 2-2 | 8-9 |
| JAN 10 | vs New Mexico State | L 85–88 | — | 29 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-11 | 0-2 | 2-3 |
| JAN 12 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 64–79 | — | 29 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 15 | @ San José State | L 74–76 | GS | 33 | 19 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9-12 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 17 | @ Utah State | L 59–81 | GS | 31 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-12 | 0-1 | 1-4 |
| JAN 21 | vs Nevada | L 82–88 | GS | 30 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-12 | 1-3 | 2-4 |
| JAN 26 | @ Idaho | W 77–67 | GS | 41 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6-10 | 0-1 | 3-5 |
| JAN 31 | vs Fresno State | W 65–49 | GS | 32 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5-10 | 0-2 | 3-4 |
| FEB 7 | vs Idaho | L 55–79 | GS | 27 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 7-10 | 0-1 | 2-4 |
| FEB 12 | vs Utah State | L 67–72 | — | 22 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| FEB 14 | @ Nevada | L 80–88 | GS | 25 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7-10 | 1-1 | 3-4 |
| FEB 18 | vs Cal State Bakersfield | W 81–62 | — | 25 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| FEB 21 | vs UC Davis | L 74–82 | GS | 33 | 15 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5-12 | 0-1 | 5-9 |
| FEB 26 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 72–59 | — | 31 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-13 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| FEB 28 | @ New Mexico State | L 92–95 | — | 33 | 22 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9-13 | 1-1 | 3-3 |
| MAR 6 | vs San José State | W 85–56 | — | 22 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-7 | 1-1 | 1-3 |
| MAR 11 | @ Utah State | L 60–84 | — | 31 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-14 | 1-2 | 5-7 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.