AUSTIN MORGAN
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Yale | 26 | 767 | 271 | 10.4 | 38 | 44 | 28 | 1 | 52 | 73-204 | 35.8% | 46-129 | 35.7% | 90.8% |
| 2011-12 | Yale | 28 | 873 | 334 | 11.9 | 58 | 65 | 21 | 1 | 46 | 93-245 | 38.0% | 60-153 | 39.2% | 89.8% |
| 2010-11 | Yale | 28 | 865 | 353 | 12.6 | 55 | 90 | 26 | 3 | 66 | 103-235 | 43.8% | 54-121 | 44.6% | 80.2% |
| 2009-10 | Yale | 30 | 409 | 142 | 4.7 | 36 | 27 | 13 | 1 | 25 | 42-99 | 42.4% | 24-64 | 37.5% | 79.1% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 112 | 2,914 | 1,100 | 9.8 | 187 | 226 | 88 | 6 | 189 | 311-783 | 39.7% | 184-467 | 39.4% | 85.5% |
02/2010-11 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 14 | vs Quinnipiac | L 75–84 | GS | 28 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-4 | 6-7 |
| NOV 16 | @ Providence | L 55–58 | GS | 32 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-12 | 3-6 | 3-5 |
| NOV 19 | @ Boston College | W 75–67 | GS | 31 | 25 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9-14 | 6-9 | 1-2 |
| NOV 24 | @ Illinois | L 47–73 | GS | 32 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-10 | 2-5 | 4-4 |
| NOV 27 | vs Army | W 87–79 | GS | 30 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 6-7 |
| DEC 1 | vs Hartford | W 81–76 | GS | 37 | 22 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-8 | 5-5 | 7-9 |
| DEC 4 | @ Vermont | L 78–82 | GS | 33 | 25 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6-13 | 4-7 | 9-9 |
| DEC 7 | vs UAlbany | W 74–53 | GS | 20 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-5 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| DEC 9 | @ Bryant | W 75–53 | GS | 29 | 14 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4-7 | 3-5 | 3-5 |
| DEC 19 | vs Sacred Heart | L 62–71 | GS | 31 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-10 | 0-4 | 4-7 |
| DEC 29 | @ Stanford | L 44–60 | GS | 33 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-8 | 3-3 | 4-5 |
| DEC 31 | vs Lehigh | L 57–62 | GS | 23 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
| JAN 6 | @ Holy Cross | W 77–76 | GS | 38 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6-13 | 1-7 | 4-5 |
| JAN 8 | vs Baruch College | W 85–35 | GS | 19 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
| JAN 15 | @ Brown | W 69–64 | — | 25 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 22 | vs Brown | W 59–51 | GS | 28 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1-10 | 0-4 | 0-2 |
| JAN 29 | @ Princeton | L 63–67 | GS | 31 | 11 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-8 | 3-5 | 2-3 |
| JAN 29 | @ Pennsylvania | L 58–66 | GS | 29 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1-7 | 1-5 | 2-2 |
| FEB 5 | vs Cornell | W 71–70 | GS | 27 | 17 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-12 | 2-5 | 5-5 |
| FEB 5 | vs Columbia | W 72–67 | GS | 32 | 15 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 5-6 |
| FEB 12 | @ Harvard | L 75–78 | GS | 37 | 22 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-5 | 4-4 | 10-10 |
| FEB 13 | @ Dartmouth | W 69–60 | GS | 34 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| FEB 19 | vs Princeton | L 51–58 | GS | 35 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-3 | 2-3 |
| FEB 20 | vs Pennsylvania | L 58–60 | GS | 35 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1-6 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
| FEB 26 | vs Harvard | W 70–69 | GS | 36 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5-8 | 4-6 | 2-2 |
| FEB 26 | vs Dartmouth | W 79–75 | GS | 26 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-6 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| MAR 5 | @ Columbia | W 87–81 | GS | 42 | 19 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-11 | 2-6 | 7-8 |
| MAR 6 | @ Cornell | L 55–68 | GS | 32 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 2-3 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.