CALEB LOVE
01/Season by season
5 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Arizona | 34 | 1,156 | 564 | 16.6 | 143 | 118 | 41 | 10 | 67 | 189-490 | 38.6% | 86-266 | 32.3% | 88.5% |
| 2023-24 | Arizona | 33 | 1,057 | 598 | 18.1 | 156 | 111 | 37 | 9 | 67 | 201-478 | 42.1% | 86-248 | 34.7% | 85.3% |
| 2022-23 | North Carolina | 33 | 1,181 | 550 | 16.7 | 121 | 94 | 35 | 7 | 80 | 188-497 | 37.8% | 73-244 | 29.9% | 76.5% |
| 2021-22 | North Carolina | 33 | 1,111 | 508 | 15.4 | 113 | 125 | 36 | 7 | 87 | 158-428 | 36.9% | 74-200 | 37.0% | 87.4% |
| 2020-21 | North Carolina | 28 | 774 | 295 | 10.5 | 74 | 101 | 34 | 10 | 91 | 100-316 | 31.6% | 32-123 | 26.0% | 80.8% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 5 seasons | 161 | 5,279 | 2,515 | 15.6 | 607 | 549 | 183 | 43 | 392 | 836-2,209 | 37.8% | 351-1,081 | 32.5% | 83.8% |
02/2020-21 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 25 | vs Charleston | W 79–60 | GS | 26 | 17 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4-11 | 1-4 | 8-8 |
| DEC 1 | @ UNLV | W 78–51 | GS | 27 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2-9 | 0-5 | 2-4 |
| DEC 1 | @ Stanford | W 67–63 | GS | 36 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6-18 | 2-6 | 2-2 |
| DEC 2 | vs Texas | L 67–69 | GS | 30 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-13 | 0-4 | 1-2 |
| DEC 9 | @ Iowa | L 80–93 | GS | 32 | 11 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4-13 | 1-4 | 2-3 |
| DEC 12 | vs North Carolina Central | W 73–67 | GS | 32 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 4-9 | 0-2 | 4-5 |
| DEC 19 | @ Kentucky | W 75–63 | GS | 30 | 11 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-14 | 0-5 | 3-3 |
| DEC 23 | @ NC State | L 76–79 | GS | 28 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-14 | 0-4 | 5-5 |
| DEC 31 | @ Georgia Tech | L 67–72 | — | 25 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3-10 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| JAN 2 | vs Notre Dame | W 66–65 | GS | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| JAN 6 | @ Miami | W 67–65 | — | 28 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| JAN 13 | vs Syracuse | W 81–75 | GS | 20 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-10 | 1-5 | 2-2 |
| JAN 16 | @ Florida State | L 75–82 | GS | 21 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4-10 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| JAN 21 | vs Wake Forest | W 80–73 | GS | 32 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7-12 | 2-3 | 4-7 |
| JAN 23 | vs NC State | W 86–76 | GS | 28 | 15 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6-15 | 0-2 | 3-4 |
| JAN 27 | @ Pittsburgh | W 75–65 | GS | 26 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-10 | 1-5 | 1-4 |
| FEB 3 | @ Clemson | L 50–63 | GS | 29 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2-10 | 1-6 | 4-4 |
| FEB 6 | @ Duke | W 91–87 | GS | 31 | 25 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9-16 | 4-5 | 3-3 |
| FEB 13 | @ Virginia | L 48–60 | GS | 25 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-9 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| FEB 18 | vs Northeastern | W 82–62 | GS | 30 | 6 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2-8 | 0-4 | 2-2 |
| FEB 20 | vs Louisville | W 99–54 | GS | 27 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4-8 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| FEB 25 | vs Marquette | L 70–83 | GS | 30 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0-6 | 0-2 | 1-2 |
| FEB 27 | vs Florida State | W 78–70 | GS | 31 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 3-13 | 0-4 | 6-6 |
| MAR 2 | @ Syracuse | L 70–72 | GS | 29 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3-10 | 2-5 | 2-4 |
| MAR 6 | vs Duke | W 91–73 | — | 30 | 18 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6-12 | 2-6 | 4-4 |
| MAR 11 | vs Notre Dame | W 101–59 | GS | 24 | 15 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6-14 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| MAR 12 | @ Virginia Tech | W 81–73 | GS | 26 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-12 | 1-7 | 2-2 |
| MAR 13 | @ Florida State | L 66–69 | GS | 26 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4-14 | 3-5 | 2-2 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.