PAXSON WOJCIK
01/Season by season
5 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | North Carolina | 29 | 240 | 45 | 1.6 | 25 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 14-43 | 32.6% | 5-26 | 19.2% | 70.6% |
| 2022-23 | Brown | 27 | 933 | 402 | 14.9 | 194 | 87 | 35 | 1 | 49 | 137-297 | 46.1% | 57-150 | 38.0% | 68.9% |
| 2021-22 | Brown | 27 | 745 | 259 | 9.6 | 81 | 36 | 24 | 2 | 31 | 93-221 | 42.1% | 38-115 | 33.0% | 66.0% |
| 2020-21 | Loyola Chicago | 14 | 93 | 37 | 2.6 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 13-26 | 50.0% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 77.8% |
| 2019-20 | Loyola Chicago | 30 | 327 | 61 | 2.0 | 37 | 18 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 42.9% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 5 seasons | 127 | 2,338 | 804 | 6.3 | 351 | 157 | 78 | 4 | 109 | 282-635 | 44.4% | 112-320 | 35.0% | 67.7% |
02/2022-23 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 8 | @ Vermont | L 65–80 | GS | 33 | 13 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 5-12 | 1-5 | 2-2 |
| NOV 11 | vs Colgate | L 68–77 | GS | 26 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-9 | 2-4 | 2-2 |
| NOV 13 | @ Loyola Maryland | L 70–75 | GS | 38 | 12 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4-9 | 3-4 | 1-4 |
| NOV 18 | vs Stony Brook | W 64–53 | GS | 34 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-6 | 2-5 |
| NOV 24 | vs UMass Lowell | L 62–73 | GS | 33 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6-12 | 5-10 | 0-0 |
| NOV 27 | vs Maine | W 70–63 | GS | 35 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-6 | 2-4 | 1-1 |
| NOV 30 | @ Central Connecticut | W 59–51 | GS | 34 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-10 | 0-3 | 3-5 |
| DEC 2 | @ Bryant | W 72–60 | GS | 37 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-12 | 3-8 | 3-4 |
| DEC 4 | @ Hartford | W 65–51 | GS | 30 | 19 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8-12 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| DEC 8 | @ Rhode Island | W 59–58 | GS | 36 | 8 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-14 | 1-8 | 1-3 |
| DEC 10 | @ Michigan State | L 50–68 | GS | 36 | 10 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-11 | 1-6 | 3-4 |
| DEC 22 | vs New Hampshire | W 67–51 | GS | 28 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-10 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| DEC 29 | @ Northwestern | L 58–63 | GS | 34 | 13 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4-13 | 4-9 | 1-2 |
| JAN 3 | vs Pennsylvania | L 68–76 | GS | 34 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-10 | 1-3 | 1-3 |
| JAN 7 | vs Harvard | L 68–70 | GS | 39 | 17 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6-11 | 4-8 | 1-1 |
| JAN 7 | vs Dartmouth | W 77–70 | GS | 36 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5-12 | 4-7 | 2-2 |
| JAN 14 | vs Princeton | W 72–70 | GS | 36 | 14 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5-10 | 1-3 | 3-5 |
| JAN 16 | @ Yale | L 78–81 | GS | 37 | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-11 | 1-4 | 2-4 |
| JAN 21 | vs Columbia | W 97–85 | GS | 32 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 28 | @ Cornell | L 73–80 | GS | 37 | 22 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7-13 | 4-7 | 4-4 |
| FEB 3 | @ Dartmouth | W 73–61 | GS | 36 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-10 | 3-7 | 4-4 |
| FEB 4 | @ Harvard | W 68–65 | GS | 36 | 23 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-13 | 3-7 | 8-11 |
| FEB 11 | vs Cornell | W 80–66 | GS | 34 | 15 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-12 | 3-7 | 0-0 |
| FEB 18 | @ Pennsylvania | L 69–90 | GS | 34 | 24 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6-10 | 3-5 | 9-11 |
| FEB 18 | @ Princeton | L 67–78 | GS | 33 | 15 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-13 | 0-5 | 7-10 |
| FEB 25 | @ Columbia | W 84–73 | GS | 37 | 20 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7-9 | 0-1 | 6-9 |
| MAR 5 | vs Yale | L 75–84 | GS | 38 | 25 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9-16 | 2-7 | 5-7 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.