JOE PRIDGEN
01/Season by season
5 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Montana | 34 | 943 | 391 | 11.5 | 234 | 45 | 29 | 25 | 48 | 168-264 | 63.6% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 57.5% |
| 2023-24 | Northeastern | 17 | 416 | 150 | 8.8 | 86 | 30 | 10 | 9 | 29 | 59-137 | 43.1% | 11-43 | 25.6% | 70.0% |
| 2022-23 | Northeastern | 26 | 572 | 191 | 7.3 | 128 | 38 | 15 | 16 | 45 | 79-204 | 38.7% | 20-58 | 34.5% | 56.5% |
| 2020-21 | UNC Wilmington | 14 | 473 | 169 | 12.1 | 115 | 26 | 17 | 11 | 29 | 67-120 | 55.8% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 63.0% |
| 2019-20 | Holy Cross | 30 | 1,057 | 521 | 17.4 | 204 | 66 | 28 | 15 | 106 | 208-373 | 55.8% | 12-28 | 42.9% | 58.1% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 5 seasons | 121 | 3,461 | 1,422 | 11.8 | 767 | 205 | 99 | 76 | 257 | 581-1,098 | 52.9% | 54-168 | 32.1% | 59.5% |
02/2022-23 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 8 | @ Boston University | L 63–72 | — | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| NOV 19 | @ Syracuse | L 48–76 | — | 21 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| NOV 24 | vs Manhattan | W 69–67 | — | 27 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 9-15 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| NOV 26 | @ Princeton | L 54–56 | — | 30 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4-15 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| DEC 3 | @ Georgia Tech | L 63–81 | — | 16 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-10 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| DEC 4 | vs Georgia State | W 66–46 | — | 21 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-11 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| DEC 10 | vs Holy Cross | W 59–58 | — | 25 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6-13 | 1-4 | 0-2 |
| DEC 18 | @ UIC | L 73–81 | — | 21 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| DEC 21 | @ Davidson | W 73–70 | — | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 30 | vs North Carolina A&T | W 88–76 | — | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| DEC 31 | vs Stony Brook | L 61–65 | — | 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 6 | @ William & Mary | L 66–69 | — | 26 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6-10 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 7 | @ Hampton | W 79–63 | — | 17 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 2-4 |
| JAN 14 | vs Drexel | L 55–76 | — | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 16 | vs Delaware | W 59–58 | GS | 36 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5-12 | 2-3 | 2-2 |
| JAN 20 | @ Stony Brook | W 79–66 | GS | 33 | 15 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-8 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| JAN 21 | vs Charleston | L 61–87 | GS | 20 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| JAN 28 | @ Delaware | L 78–81 | GS | 15 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| FEB 8 | vs Hofstra | L 53–72 | GS | 34 | 4 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-8 | 1-4 | 1-2 |
| FEB 12 | @ UNC Wilmington | L 59–71 | GS | 32 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6-12 | 0-3 | 2-2 |
| FEB 14 | @ Charleston | L 63–99 | GS | 17 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| FEB 17 | vs Monmouth | W 77–62 | GS | 32 | 9 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-8 | 0-2 | 3-4 |
| FEB 18 | vs William & Mary | W 69–57 | GS | 32 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| FEB 24 | @ Drexel | L 48–75 | GS | 28 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-12 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| FEB 25 | @ Hofstra | L 52–84 | — | 13 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| MAR 5 | @ Delaware | L 74–77 | GS | 36 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.