CALEB MILLS
01/Season by season
5 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Memphis | 14 | 339 | 111 | 7.9 | 44 | 19 | 11 | 6 | 13 | 34-88 | 38.6% | 11-30 | 36.7% | 72.7% |
| 2022-23 | Florida State | 32 | 948 | 416 | 13.0 | 96 | 110 | 43 | 19 | 70 | 137-334 | 41.0% | 30-102 | 29.4% | 83.6% |
| 2021-22 | Florida State | 26 | 684 | 329 | 12.7 | 62 | 63 | 39 | 13 | 53 | 120-277 | 43.3% | 30-85 | 35.3% | 85.5% |
| 2020-21 | Houston | 4 | 76 | 39 | 9.8 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 13-29 | 44.8% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 100.0% |
| 2019-20 | Houston | 31 | 698 | 409 | 13.2 | 82 | 35 | 16 | 5 | 43 | 143-371 | 38.5% | 50-137 | 36.5% | 75.3% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 5 seasons | 107 | 2,745 | 1,304 | 12.2 | 289 | 228 | 114 | 43 | 185 | 447-1,099 | 40.7% | 122-358 | 34.1% | 80.9% |
02/2021-22 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 11 | vs Pennsylvania | W 105–70 | GS | 21 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6-13 | 1-4 | 1-1 |
| NOV 14 | @ Florida | L 55–71 | GS | 17 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| NOV 18 | vs Tulane | W 59–54 | GS | 34 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5-15 | 2-6 | 1-2 |
| NOV 21 | @ Loyola Marymount | W 73–45 | GS | 24 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4-10 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| NOV 23 | @ Missouri | W 81–58 | GS | 25 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| NOV 25 | vs Boston University | W 81–80 | GS | 36 | 17 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 5-13 | 1-1 | 6-7 |
| DEC 1 | @ Purdue | L 65–93 | GS | 33 | 22 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9-16 | 2-3 | 2-2 |
| DEC 4 | vs Syracuse | L 60–63 | GS | 38 | 16 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7-13 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| DEC 12 | @ South Carolina | L 65–66 | GS | 32 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4-13 | 0-3 | 5-5 |
| DEC 16 | vs Lipscomb | W 97–60 | GS | 21 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| JAN 1 | @ NC State | W 83–81 | GS | 30 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-10 | 1-3 | 2-3 |
| JAN 5 | @ Wake Forest | L 54–76 | GS | 29 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-13 | 0-3 | 6-6 |
| JAN 9 | vs Louisville | W 79–70 | GS | 24 | 27 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9-16 | 3-5 | 6-8 |
| JAN 12 | vs Miami | W 65–64 | GS | 28 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2-10 | 0-5 | 0-0 |
| JAN 15 | @ Syracuse | W 76–71 | GS | 32 | 19 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6-9 | 5-6 | 2-2 |
| JAN 19 | vs Duke | W 79–78 | GS | 35 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5-17 | 2-6 | 6-6 |
| JAN 20 | vs North Florida | W 86–73 | GS | 27 | 21 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8-12 | 1-3 | 4-4 |
| JAN 22 | @ Miami | W 61–60 | GS | 32 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7-9 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
| JAN 27 | @ Georgia Tech | L 61–75 | GS | 19 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| JAN 29 | vs Virginia Tech | L 72–85 | — | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| FEB 3 | @ Clemson | L 69–75 | GS | 31 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6-11 | 1-2 | 3-4 |
| FEB 5 | vs Wake Forest | L 60–68 | GS | 30 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 6-16 | 1-4 | 2-3 |
| FEB 10 | vs Pittsburgh | L 51–56 | GS | 34 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-16 | 4-8 | 3-5 |
| FEB 12 | @ North Carolina | L 74–94 | GS | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| MAR 5 | vs NC State | W 89–76 | — | 18 | 19 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 5-5 |
| MAR 9 | vs Syracuse | L 57–96 | — | 24 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-11 | 1-7 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.