FARDAWS AIMAQ
01/Season by season
5 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | California | 32 | 1,027 | 463 | 14.5 | 351 | 68 | 29 | 33 | 80 | 179-386 | 46.4% | 16-53 | 30.2% | 65.0% |
| 2022-23 | Texas Tech | 11 | 301 | 122 | 11.1 | 87 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 25 | 47-106 | 44.3% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 74.2% |
| 2021-22 | Utah Valley | 32 | 1,101 | 605 | 18.9 | 435 | 55 | 22 | 40 | 95 | 222-453 | 49.0% | 20-46 | 43.5% | 72.3% |
| 2020-21 | Utah Valley | 22 | 671 | 305 | 13.9 | 330 | 35 | 5 | 37 | 73 | 114-235 | 48.5% | 1-1 | 100.0% | 61.8% |
| 2018-19 | Mercer | 29 | 432 | 146 | 5.0 | 153 | 7 | 6 | 22 | 40 | 62-120 | 51.7% | 1-1 | 100.0% | 42.0% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 5 seasons | 126 | 3,532 | 1,641 | 13.0 | 1,356 | 182 | 67 | 135 | 313 | 624-1,300 | 48.0% | 43-119 | 36.1% | 65.3% |
02/2023-24 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 7 | vs St. Thomas-Minnesota | W 71–66 | GS | 30 | 16 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 4-6 |
| NOV 11 | vs Pacific | L 79–87 | GS | 35 | 18 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 7-13 | 0-2 | 4-9 |
| NOV 14 | vs Cal State Bakersfield | W 83–63 | GS | 23 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-6 | 1-1 | 5-7 |
| NOV 17 | vs Montana State | L 60–63 | GS | 35 | 14 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-11 | 1-2 | 3-4 |
| NOV 21 | vs UTEP | L 72–75 | GS | 27 | 18 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 9-13 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| NOV 23 | @ Tulane | L 81–84 | GS | 33 | 23 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 9-14 | 1-3 | 4-4 |
| NOV 26 | @ San Diego State | L 67–76 | GS | 39 | 14 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-11 | 1-1 | 5-9 |
| DEC 3 | vs Santa Clara | W 84–69 | GS | 33 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7-15 | 0-2 | 1-1 |
| DEC 9 | @ Butler | L 90–97 | GS | 45 | 24 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9-22 | 2-3 | 4-5 |
| DEC 17 | @ Ole Miss | L 78–88 | GS | 34 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-16 | 0-2 | 1-1 |
| DEC 20 | vs UC San Diego | W 71–67 | GS | 33 | 19 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 9-12 | 0-1 | 1-5 |
| DEC 30 | vs Arizona | L 81–100 | GS | 21 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| JAN 1 | vs Arizona State | L 69–71 | GS | 33 | 17 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-11 | 1-1 | 4-5 |
| JAN 4 | @ USC | L 74–82 | GS | 33 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3-8 | 0-3 | 1-3 |
| JAN 7 | @ UCLA | W 66–57 | GS | 31 | 13 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4-12 | 1-1 | 4-6 |
| JAN 11 | vs Colorado | W 82–78 | GS | 24 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| JAN 14 | @ Oregon | L 73–80 | GS | 32 | 18 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-11 | 1-3 | 3-5 |
| JAN 19 | vs Washington | L 75–77 | GS | 32 | 18 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8-14 | 0-1 | 2-4 |
| JAN 20 | vs Washington State | W 81–75 | GS | 38 | 18 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7-14 | 0-0 | 4-6 |
| JAN 27 | vs Stanford | W 73–71 | GS | 34 | 13 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5-12 | 1-2 | 2-5 |
| FEB 2 | @ Arizona | L 65–91 | GS | 28 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 3-4 |
| FEB 3 | @ Arizona State | W 81–66 | GS | 37 | 20 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8-12 | 0-0 | 4-5 |
| FEB 8 | vs USC | W 83–77 | GS | 43 | 15 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7-25 | 0-2 | 1-2 |
| FEB 10 | vs UCLA | L 60–61 | GS | 29 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4-12 | 1-2 | 3-4 |
| FEB 16 | @ Washington State | L 65–84 | GS | 28 | 6 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 4-4 |
| FEB 18 | @ Washington | W 82–80 | GS | 29 | 13 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 6-12 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| FEB 23 | vs Oregon State | W 81–73 | GS | 36 | 21 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-8 | 2-3 | 11-14 |
| FEB 25 | vs Oregon | W 69–64 | GS | 31 | 8 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-8 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| FEB 29 | @ Colorado | L 78–88 | GS | 31 | 11 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 5-13 | 0-3 | 1-3 |
| MAR 3 | @ Utah | L 59–88 | GS | 32 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 6-14 | 1-3 | 2-4 |
| MAR 8 | @ Stanford | L 58–80 | GS | 30 | 18 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7-16 | 0-1 | 4-5 |
| MAR 14 | vs Stanford | L 76–87 | GS | 28 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.