NOAH KIRKWOOD
01/Season by season
3 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Harvard | 26 | 853 | 461 | 17.7 | 147 | 77 | 48 | 12 | 72 | 176-369 | 47.7% | 47-133 | 35.3% | 80.5% |
| 2019-20 | Harvard | 27 | 779 | 327 | 12.1 | 101 | 63 | 28 | 7 | 72 | 119-264 | 45.1% | 38-105 | 36.2% | 61.4% |
| 2018-19 | Harvard | 28 | 720 | 302 | 10.8 | 123 | 44 | 27 | 5 | 82 | 111-244 | 45.5% | 43-101 | 42.6% | 64.9% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 3 seasons | 81 | 2,352 | 1,090 | 13.5 | 371 | 184 | 103 | 24 | 226 | 406-877 | 46.3% | 128-339 | 37.8% | 69.1% |
02/2018-19 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 7 | vs MIT | W 78–66 | — | 21 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5-9 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| NOV 10 | vs Northeastern | L 71–81 | — | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| NOV 14 | @ Massachusetts | W 74–71 | — | 23 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3-8 | 1-1 | 2-3 |
| NOV 17 | @ Rhode Island | L 74–76 | — | 18 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1-5 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| NOV 22 | @ San Francisco | L 57–61 | — | 24 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-12 | 2-6 | 0-1 |
| NOV 25 | @ Saint Mary's | W 74–68 | — | 23 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-3 | 3-3 |
| NOV 25 | @ Saint Mary's | W 74–68 | — | 23 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-3 | 3-3 |
| NOV 29 | vs Holy Cross | W 73–62 | — | 26 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7-8 | 4-5 | 2-4 |
| DEC 1 | @ Siena | L 64–67 | — | 26 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2-8 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| DEC 9 | @ Vermont | L 65–71 | — | 15 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 22 | vs George Washington | W 75–61 | — | 30 | 20 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7-12 | 4-8 | 2-3 |
| DEC 29 | @ Mercer | W 71–67 | — | 27 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8-12 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| JAN 3 | @ North Carolina | L 57–77 | — | 18 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| JAN 13 | @ Dartmouth | L 63–81 | — | 29 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-11 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| JAN 26 | vs Dartmouth | W 64–59 | — | 17 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 5-5 |
| FEB 2 | vs Yale | W 65–49 | — | 26 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-7 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| FEB 3 | vs Brown | W 68–47 | — | 18 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 1-3 |
| FEB 9 | vs Columbia | W 98–96 | — | 29 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 0-2 |
| FEB 10 | vs Cornell | L 61–67 | GS | 31 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| FEB 16 | @ Princeton | W 78–69 | — | 28 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6-10 | 4-5 | 0-1 |
| FEB 17 | @ Pennsylvania | W 75–68 | — | 32 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6-12 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| FEB 23 | @ Brown | L 79–88 | — | 33 | 28 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11-18 | 5-9 | 1-3 |
| FEB 24 | @ Yale | W 88–86 | GS | 33 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| MAR 2 | vs Pennsylvania | W 59–53 | GS | 36 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4-12 | 1-3 | 3-7 |
| MAR 3 | vs Princeton | W 66–58 | — | 29 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
| MAR 9 | @ Cornell | L 59–72 | GS | 33 | 12 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5-14 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| MAR 10 | @ Columbia | W 83–81 | GS | 29 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2-9 | 0-2 | 6-6 |
| MAR 16 | vs Pennsylvania | W 66–58 | GS | 28 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-8 | 2-5 | 2-2 |
| MAR 17 | vs Yale | L 85–97 | GS | 32 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7-12 | 3-5 | 2-3 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.