TREY WERTZ
01/Season by season
5 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Notre Dame | 32 | 977 | 268 | 8.4 | 94 | 105 | 24 | 3 | 49 | 89-243 | 36.6% | 45-139 | 32.4% | 80.4% |
| 2021-22 | Notre Dame | 31 | 596 | 131 | 4.2 | 58 | 62 | 10 | 0 | 30 | 45-115 | 39.1% | 24-62 | 38.7% | 81.0% |
| 2020-21 | Notre Dame | 21 | 555 | 174 | 8.3 | 56 | 49 | 8 | 2 | 36 | 59-146 | 40.4% | 33-77 | 42.9% | 82.1% |
| 2019-20 | Santa Clara | 31 | 887 | 368 | 11.9 | 107 | 122 | 28 | 4 | 78 | 131-268 | 48.9% | 50-125 | 40.0% | 75.7% |
| 2018-19 | Santa Clara | 31 | 1,013 | 379 | 12.2 | 91 | 146 | 28 | 3 | 118 | 134-301 | 44.5% | 39-123 | 31.7% | 75.8% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 5 seasons | 146 | 4,028 | 1,320 | 9.0 | 406 | 484 | 98 | 12 | 311 | 458-1,073 | 42.7% | 191-526 | 36.3% | 77.7% |
02/2022-23 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 11 | vs Radford | W 79–76 | GS | 36 | 18 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7-9 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| NOV 13 | vs Youngstown State | W 88–81 | GS | 31 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6-9 | 1-4 | 2-2 |
| NOV 17 | vs Southern Indiana | W 82–70 | GS | 36 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6-12 | 3-9 | 5-6 |
| NOV 19 | vs Lipscomb | W 66–65 | GS | 39 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-9 | 2-7 | 0-1 |
| NOV 22 | vs Bowling Green | W 82–66 | GS | 36 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| NOV 25 | @ St. Bonaventure | L 51–63 | GS | 36 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-9 | 0-4 | 3-4 |
| DEC 1 | vs Michigan State | W 70–52 | GS | 39 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-6 | 2-4 | 2-2 |
| DEC 3 | vs Syracuse | L 61–62 | GS | 30 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2-9 | 2-9 | 0-0 |
| DEC 8 | vs Boston University | W 81–75 | GS | 37 | 16 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6-12 | 3-6 | 1-1 |
| DEC 11 | vs Marquette | L 64–79 | GS | 29 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-6 | 2-5 | 1-2 |
| DEC 18 | @ Georgia | L 62–77 | GS | 28 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 1-1 |
| DEC 22 | @ Florida State | L 72–73 | GS | 30 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| DEC 28 | vs Jacksonville | W 59–43 | GS | 28 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3-7 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| DEC 30 | vs Miami | L 65–76 | GS | 32 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6-9 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| JAN 4 | @ Boston College | L 63–70 | GS | 35 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-9 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| JAN 7 | @ North Carolina | L 64–81 | — | 25 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| JAN 11 | vs Georgia Tech | W 73–72 | GS | 36 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2-7 | 2-4 | 0-2 |
| JAN 15 | @ Syracuse | L 73–78 | GS | 38 | 12 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-9 | 4-8 | 0-0 |
| JAN 18 | vs Florida State | L 71–84 | GS | 29 | 15 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5-14 | 1-7 | 4-4 |
| JAN 21 | vs Boston College | L 72–84 | — | 21 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 25 | @ NC State | L 82–85 | — | 18 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 4-4 |
| JAN 28 | vs Louisville | W 76–62 | — | 20 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-5 | 1-2 |
| FEB 4 | vs Wake Forest | L 64–81 | — | 30 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| FEB 9 | @ Georgia Tech | L 68–70 | — | 21 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 11 | vs Virginia Tech | L 87–93 | — | 18 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 15 | @ Duke | L 64–68 | — | 23 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-7 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| FEB 18 | @ Virginia | L 55–57 | — | 26 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 2-4 |
| FEB 23 | vs North Carolina | L 59–63 | — | 34 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-14 | 3-7 | 0-1 |
| FEB 26 | @ Wake Forest | L 58–66 | GS | 38 | 12 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-10 | 2-5 | 4-4 |
| MAR 2 | vs Pittsburgh | W 88–81 | GS | 36 | 14 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-7 | 2-6 | 8-8 |
| MAR 5 | @ Clemson | L 64–87 | GS | 29 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| MAR 8 | @ Virginia Tech | L 64–67 | GS | 33 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-7 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.