ELIJAH WEAVER
01/Season by season
5 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Chicago State | 30 | 1,006 | 375 | 12.5 | 120 | 101 | 31 | 7 | 83 | 123-318 | 38.7% | 71-195 | 36.4% | 81.7% |
| 2021-22 | Dayton | 22 | 427 | 146 | 6.6 | 26 | 36 | 13 | 1 | 33 | 49-103 | 47.6% | 19-52 | 36.5% | 82.9% |
| 2020-21 | Dayton | 17 | 369 | 81 | 4.8 | 35 | 43 | 10 | 1 | 26 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 9-32 | 28.1% | 72.0% |
| 2019-20 | USC | 31 | 684 | 206 | 6.6 | 74 | 56 | 15 | 1 | 57 | 74-180 | 41.1% | 26-79 | 32.9% | 55.2% |
| 2018-19 | USC | 28 | 573 | 144 | 5.1 | 47 | 66 | 17 | 4 | 48 | 53-126 | 42.1% | 22-62 | 35.5% | 76.2% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 5 seasons | 128 | 3,059 | 952 | 7.4 | 302 | 302 | 86 | 14 | 247 | 326-796 | 41.0% | 147-420 | 35.0% | 72.9% |
02/2018-19 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 15 | vs Stetson | W 95–59 | — | 23 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| NOV 20 | @ Texas Tech | L 63–78 | — | 18 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| NOV 21 | @ Missouri State | W 99–80 | — | 16 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| NOV 26 | vs Cal State Bakersfield | W 90–75 | GS | 25 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| NOV 29 | vs Long Beach State | W 75–65 | — | 17 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| DEC 1 | vs Nevada | L 61–73 | — | 13 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| DEC 8 | vs TCU | L 61–96 | — | 23 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4-9 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| DEC 16 | @ Oklahoma | L 70–81 | — | 23 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| DEC 19 | @ Santa Clara | L 92–102 | — | 23 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 1-2 |
| DEC 31 | vs UC Davis | W 73–55 | — | 29 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-6 | 2-3 | 1-1 |
| JAN 11 | @ Oregon State | L 74–79 | — | 15 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| JAN 14 | @ Oregon | L 60–81 | — | 28 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-7 | 0-3 | 3-3 |
| JAN 19 | vs UCLA | W 80–67 | — | 25 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-1 |
| JAN 25 | vs Arizona | W 80–57 | — | 21 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| JAN 27 | vs Arizona State | W 69–67 | — | 15 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| JAN 31 | @ Washington | L 62–75 | — | 18 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
| FEB 3 | @ Washington State | W 93–84 | — | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| FEB 7 | vs Utah | L 70–77 | — | 22 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| FEB 10 | vs Colorado | L 65–69 | — | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 14 | @ Stanford | L 76–79 | — | 18 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 2-2 |
| FEB 17 | @ California | W 89–66 | — | 22 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| FEB 22 | vs Oregon | W 66–49 | — | 18 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 23 | vs Oregon State | L 62–67 | — | 13 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| MAR 1 | @ UCLA | L 88–93 | — | 24 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| MAR 8 | @ Utah | L 74–83 | GS | 34 | 17 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7-10 | 1-3 | 2-3 |
| MAR 9 | @ Colorado | L 67–78 | GS | 28 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| MAR 13 | vs Arizona | W 78–65 | GS | 22 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| MAR 14 | @ Washington | L 75–78 | GS | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.