JULES MOOR
01/Season by season
1 season
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Stony Brook | 32 | 402 | 146 | 4.6 | 80 | 19 | 34 | 8 | 33 | 52-123 | 42.3% | 10-24 | 41.7% | 69.6% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 1 season | 32 | 402 | 146 | 4.6 | 80 | 19 | 34 | 8 | 33 | 52-123 | 42.3% | 10-24 | 41.7% | 69.6% |
02/2018-19 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 7 | @ George Washington | W 77–74 | — | 12 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 3-5 |
| NOV 10 | @ South Carolina | W 83–81 | — | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| NOV 16 | @ Holy Cross | L 70–84 | — | 10 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| NOV 18 | vs Norfolk State | W 72–65 | — | 11 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-4 |
| NOV 21 | vs Molloy | W 97–61 | — | 12 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4-8 | 1-1 | 1-2 |
| NOV 24 | @ Rhode Island | W 68–58 | GS | 17 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| NOV 28 | @ Norfolk State | W 79–73 | GS | 27 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| DEC 2 | vs Quinnipiac | W 71–61 | GS | 15 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 6 | @ Manhattan | W 69–62 | — | 18 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 4-4 |
| DEC 8 | @ Brown | L 69–71 | — | 12 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 13 | vs Long Island University | W 83–79 | — | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 16 | vs Delaware | W 74–68 | — | 9 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 20 | vs Hofstra | L 64–71 | — | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| DEC 22 | @ Quinnipiac | W 76–73 | — | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| DEC 30 | @ Northern Iowa | W 73–63 | — | 21 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6-9 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| JAN 5 | @ UMass Lowell | W 75–63 | — | 23 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
| JAN 10 | vs Binghamton | W 59–46 | — | 15 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-1 | 2-3 |
| JAN 13 | vs New Hampshire | W 62–44 | — | 13 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| JAN 19 | @ Maine | W 64–61 | — | 13 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 24 | @ UAlbany | W 67–66 | — | 15 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 27 | vs Vermont | L 52–73 | — | 15 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| JAN 31 | @ UMBC | L 49–57 | — | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
| FEB 3 | vs Hartford | W 86–77 | — | 14 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 1-2 |
| FEB 7 | @ Binghamton | W 85–59 | — | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| FEB 10 | vs UMass Lowell | W 76–65 | — | 14 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| FEB 16 | @ New Hampshire | W 66–64 | — | 10 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 4-4 |
| FEB 22 | vs UAlbany | L 70–74 | — | 15 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| FEB 24 | vs Maine | W 81–53 | — | 12 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| FEB 28 | vs UMBC | W 78–63 | — | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| MAR 3 | @ Vermont | L 50–56 | — | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| MAR 6 | @ Hartford | W 68–63 | — | 15 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| MAR 10 | vs Binghamton | L 72–78 | — | 10 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.