LANDERS NOLLEY II
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Cincinnati | 33 | 1,052 | 548 | 16.6 | 184 | 87 | 33 | 13 | 73 | 194-426 | 45.5% | 89-211 | 42.2% | 74.0% |
| 2021-22 | Memphis | 27 | 717 | 266 | 9.9 | 103 | 78 | 22 | 8 | 56 | 90-235 | 38.3% | 35-104 | 33.7% | 78.5% |
| 2020-21 | Memphis | 24 | 636 | 302 | 12.6 | 94 | 40 | 27 | 4 | 59 | 103-250 | 41.2% | 51-137 | 37.2% | 81.8% |
| 2019-20 | Virginia Tech | 32 | 967 | 495 | 15.5 | 186 | 77 | 24 | 10 | 87 | 171-462 | 37.0% | 68-215 | 31.6% | 78.0% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 116 | 3,372 | 1,611 | 13.9 | 567 | 282 | 106 | 35 | 275 | 558-1,373 | 40.6% | 243-667 | 36.4% | 77.5% |
02/2021-22 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 10 | vs Tennessee Tech | W 89–65 | — | 21 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 2-3 |
| NOV 14 | vs North Carolina Central | W 90–51 | — | 19 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-6 | 1-3 | 3-3 |
| NOV 17 | vs Saint Louis | W 90–74 | — | 22 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2-8 | 0-3 | 3-4 |
| NOV 20 | vs Western Kentucky | W 74–62 | — | 20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 1-2 |
| NOV 25 | @ Virginia Tech | W 69–61 | GS | 20 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| NOV 27 | vs Iowa State | L 59–78 | GS | 20 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-10 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| DEC 2 | @ Georgia | L 79–82 | GS | 31 | 17 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-16 | 2-6 | 5-7 |
| DEC 4 | @ Ole Miss | L 63–67 | GS | 18 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 3-5 |
| DEC 11 | vs Murray State | L 72–74 | — | 16 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 15 | vs Alabama | W 92–78 | GS | 36 | 13 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5-14 | 3-9 | 0-0 |
| DEC 30 | @ Tulane | L 84–85 | GS | 32 | 19 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-13 | 3-6 | 6-6 |
| JAN 1 | @ Wichita State | W 82–64 | — | 29 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-11 | 2-5 | 1-2 |
| JAN 5 | vs Tulsa | W 67–64 | — | 24 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2-8 | 0-4 | 2-2 |
| JAN 9 | vs Cincinnati | W 87–80 | — | 31 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 2-2 |
| JAN 13 | @ UCF | L 64–74 | — | 31 | 11 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5-13 | 1-6 | 0-0 |
| FEB 6 | vs UCF | W 88–60 | — | 22 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-1 | 0-3 |
| FEB 10 | vs Tulane | W 80–69 | — | 21 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| FEB 12 | @ Houston | W 69–59 | GS | 36 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5-7 | 4-5 | 6-6 |
| FEB 16 | @ Cincinnati | W 81–74 | GS | 34 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-10 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
| FEB 20 | @ SMU | L 57–73 | GS | 24 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-13 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| FEB 25 | vs Temple | W 78–64 | GS | 29 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4-7 | 2-4 | 2-2 |
| FEB 27 | vs Wichita State | W 81–57 | GS | 28 | 22 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-10 | 4-6 | 4-5 |
| MAR 4 | @ South Florida | W 73–64 | GS | 34 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| MAR 6 | vs Houston | W 75–61 | GS | 32 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| MAR 12 | @ SMU | W 70–63 | GS | 31 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-18 | 0-3 | 4-5 |
| MAR 12 | vs UCF | W 85–69 | GS | 30 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-7 | 0-4 | 4-4 |
| MAR 13 | @ Houston | L 53–71 | GS | 26 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.