LEAKY BLACK
01/Season by season
5 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | North Carolina | 33 | 1,058 | 240 | 7.3 | 215 | 50 | 42 | 27 | 29 | 86-209 | 41.1% | 28-86 | 32.6% | 70.2% |
| 2021-22 | North Carolina | 32 | 913 | 161 | 5.0 | 135 | 81 | 27 | 21 | 30 | 58-121 | 47.9% | 15-42 | 35.7% | 88.2% |
| 2020-21 | North Carolina | 28 | 777 | 160 | 5.7 | 140 | 70 | 36 | 10 | 36 | 57-154 | 37.0% | 10-44 | 22.7% | 69.2% |
| 2019-20 | North Carolina | 32 | 951 | 208 | 6.5 | 161 | 83 | 40 | 25 | 56 | 80-223 | 35.9% | 16-63 | 25.4% | 69.6% |
| 2018-19 | North Carolina | 20 | 220 | 57 | 2.9 | 41 | 25 | 14 | 4 | 13 | 23-48 | 47.9% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 85.7% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 5 seasons | 145 | 3,919 | 826 | 5.7 | 692 | 309 | 159 | 87 | 164 | 304-755 | 40.3% | 74-246 | 30.1% | 73.5% |
02/2019-20 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 7 | vs Notre Dame | W 74–65 | GS | 33 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| NOV 9 | @ UNC Wilmington | W 78–62 | GS | 32 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 4-6 |
| NOV 21 | vs Elon | W 75–61 | GS | 27 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-6 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| NOV 27 | vs Alabama | W 76–67 | GS | 34 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| NOV 28 | @ Michigan | L 64–73 | GS | 21 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| NOV 29 | vs Oregon | W 78–74 | GS | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 5 | vs Ohio State | L 49–74 | GS | 25 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| DEC 8 | @ Virginia | L 47–56 | GS | 22 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
| DEC 19 | @ Gonzaga | L 81–94 | GS | 21 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| DEC 21 | vs UCLA | W 74–64 | GS | 22 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 31 | vs Yale | W 70–67 | GS | 29 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| JAN 4 | vs Georgia Tech | L 83–96 | GS | 28 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| JAN 9 | vs Pittsburgh | L 65–73 | GS | 34 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3-9 | 1-5 | 2-2 |
| JAN 11 | vs Clemson | L 76–79 | GS | 41 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| JAN 18 | @ Pittsburgh | L 52–66 | GS | 34 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 0-2 |
| JAN 23 | @ Virginia Tech | L 77–79 | GS | 47 | 12 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-10 | 3-6 | 3-4 |
| JAN 25 | vs Miami | W 94–71 | GS | 26 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| JAN 28 | @ NC State | W 75–65 | GS | 29 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| FEB 1 | vs Boston College | L 70–71 | GS | 28 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| FEB 4 | @ Florida State | L 59–65 | GS | 34 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4-10 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
| FEB 8 | vs Duke | L 96–98 | GS | 32 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3-7 | 0-3 | 2-4 |
| FEB 12 | @ Wake Forest | L 57–74 | GS | 29 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| FEB 16 | vs Virginia | L 62–64 | GS | 33 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 2-4 |
| FEB 18 | @ Notre Dame | L 76–77 | GS | 34 | 9 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 4-4 |
| FEB 22 | @ Louisville | L 55–72 | GS | 34 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 26 | vs NC State | W 85–79 | GS | 31 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-9 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| FEB 29 | @ Syracuse | W 92–79 | GS | 36 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| MAR 4 | vs Wake Forest | W 93–83 | — | 32 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 3-4 |
| MAR 7 | @ Duke | L 76–89 | GS | 30 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-10 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| MAR 10 | @ Virginia Tech | W 78–56 | GS | 26 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| MAR 12 | @ Syracuse | L 53–81 | GS | 24 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-10 | 1-2 | 3-3 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.