COOPER NEESE
01/Season by season
5 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Indiana State | 31 | 909 | 360 | 11.6 | 134 | 52 | 19 | 4 | 31 | 122-249 | 49.0% | 53-136 | 39.0% | 84.0% |
| 2021-22 | Indiana State | 26 | 926 | 389 | 15.0 | 111 | 48 | 25 | 1 | 67 | 132-331 | 39.9% | 60-197 | 30.5% | 81.3% |
| 2020-21 | Indiana State | 25 | 710 | 238 | 9.5 | 83 | 33 | 19 | 2 | 34 | 82-199 | 41.2% | 43-110 | 39.1% | 81.6% |
| 2019-20 | Indiana State | 30 | 671 | 219 | 7.3 | 74 | 37 | 13 | 2 | 24 | 68-188 | 36.2% | 43-127 | 33.9% | 67.8% |
| 2018-19 | Indiana State | 23 | 552 | 189 | 8.2 | 74 | 24 | 21 | 1 | 34 | 59-147 | 40.1% | 29-77 | 37.7% | 82.4% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 5 seasons | 135 | 3,768 | 1,395 | 10.3 | 476 | 194 | 97 | 10 | 190 | 463-1,114 | 41.6% | 228-647 | 35.2% | 79.5% |
02/2020-21 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEC 8 | vs Truman State | W 80–66 | GS | 24 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-7 | 2-6 | 2-2 |
| DEC 13 | @ Purdue | L 68–80 | GS | 31 | 22 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7-11 | 4-8 | 4-4 |
| DEC 16 | @ Saint Louis | L 59–78 | GS | 28 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2-7 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| DEC 19 | vs Ball State | W 67–57 | GS | 17 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 22 | vs Southeast Missouri State | W 72–66 | GS | 22 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-3 | 7-8 |
| DEC 27 | vs Drake | L 63–81 | GS | 31 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-9 | 4-8 | 1-2 |
| DEC 28 | vs Drake | L 66–73 | GS | 25 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-9 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| JAN 2 | @ Missouri State | L 74–84 | GS | 33 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 6-12 | 3-5 | 4-4 |
| JAN 3 | @ Missouri State | L 66–70 | GS | 33 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 10 | vs Loyola Chicago | W 76–71 | GS | 35 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4-10 | 2-5 | 2-4 |
| JAN 12 | vs Loyola Chicago | L 48–58 | GS | 30 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-8 | 2-4 | 2-2 |
| JAN 16 | @ Illinois State | W 73–65 | GS | 30 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-8 | 3-6 | 6-6 |
| JAN 17 | @ Illinois State | W 74–68 | GS | 34 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-10 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| JAN 26 | vs Southern Illinois | W 69–66 | GS | 35 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-9 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| JAN 26 | vs Southern Illinois | W 71–59 | GS | 31 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-9 | 2-4 | 3-4 |
| JAN 31 | vs Bradley | W 60–57 | GS | 24 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-9 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| FEB 1 | vs Bradley | W 67–55 | GS | 32 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-9 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| FEB 6 | @ Northern Iowa | W 61–57 | GS | 30 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-9 | 2-7 | 0-1 |
| FEB 7 | @ Northern Iowa | L 67–70 | GS | 35 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-13 | 3-8 | 0-0 |
| FEB 14 | @ Evansville | W 76–70 | — | 20 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| FEB 17 | vs Evansville | W 87–73 | — | 21 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| FEB 27 | @ Valparaiso | W 58–43 | GS | 33 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-11 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| FEB 27 | @ Valparaiso | L 58–70 | GS | 26 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-6 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| MAR 5 | vs Evansville | W 53–43 | — | 23 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| MAR 6 | @ Loyola Chicago | L 49–65 | — | 27 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.