BO HODGES
01/Season by season
5 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Butler | 17 | 484 | 170 | 10.0 | 118 | 21 | 19 | 10 | 26 | 63-158 | 39.9% | 19-59 | 32.2% | 62.5% |
| 2020-21 | Butler | 9 | 260 | 74 | 8.2 | 54 | 21 | 8 | 7 | 14 | 27-79 | 34.2% | 9-27 | 33.3% | 45.8% |
| 2019-20 | East Tennessee State | 33 | 987 | 420 | 12.7 | 193 | 84 | 47 | 26 | 74 | 163-325 | 50.2% | 15-60 | 25.0% | 63.7% |
| 2018-19 | East Tennessee State | 28 | 714 | 286 | 10.2 | 122 | 74 | 31 | 21 | 50 | 112-234 | 47.9% | 15-41 | 36.6% | 56.6% |
| 2017-18 | East Tennessee State | 31 | 674 | 289 | 9.3 | 110 | 29 | 25 | 22 | 31 | 109-213 | 51.2% | 6-25 | 24.0% | 66.3% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 5 seasons | 118 | 3,119 | 1,239 | 10.5 | 597 | 229 | 130 | 86 | 195 | 474-1,009 | 47.0% | 64-212 | 30.2% | 61.5% |
02/2018-19 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 7 | @ Georgia State | L 68–74 | GS | 26 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5-20 | 1-5 | 0-2 |
| NOV 9 | vs Hiwassee | W 109–44 | GS | 14 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| NOV 11 | @ Creighton | L 69–75 | GS | 21 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| DEC 2 | @ Wofford | L 62–79 | — | 23 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6-12 | 2-2 | 1-2 |
| DEC 4 | vs Reinhardt | W 107–60 | GS | 18 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| DEC 8 | vs UT Martin | W 80–62 | GS | 13 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 2-4 |
| DEC 15 | @ Illinois | L 55–73 | GS | 13 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 1-3 |
| DEC 22 | vs Wyoming | W 76–53 | GS | 28 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| DEC 23 | @ Norfolk State | W 89–61 | GS | 24 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5-8 | 1-1 | 3-3 |
| DEC 29 | vs Furman | W 79–56 | GS | 31 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 3-4 |
| JAN 4 | vs Samford | W 81–72 | GS | 17 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 2-4 |
| JAN 5 | vs Chattanooga | W 96–70 | GS | 25 | 15 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-9 | 0-1 | 3-5 |
| JAN 11 | @ The Citadel | W 98–73 | GS | 24 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 12 | @ Mercer | W 72–68 | GS | 27 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-1 | 3-3 |
| JAN 18 | vs VMI | W 85–82 | GS | 30 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6-13 | 1-1 | 4-6 |
| JAN 19 | vs UNC Greensboro | L 68–75 | GS | 30 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3-8 | 1-3 | 1-1 |
| JAN 27 | @ Western Carolina | W 91–69 | — | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| FEB 1 | @ Samford | W 74–66 | GS | 29 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2-10 | 0-1 | 1-5 |
| FEB 2 | @ Chattanooga | W 77–64 | GS | 31 | 13 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6-8 | 1-1 | 0-1 |
| FEB 8 | vs Wofford | L 76–78 | GS | 40 | 15 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-13 | 1-3 | 2-3 |
| FEB 9 | @ Furman | L 61–91 | GS | 34 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-9 | 0-2 | 3-4 |
| FEB 15 | vs The Citadel | W 91–83 | GS | 37 | 18 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8-12 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| FEB 16 | vs Mercer | W 88–69 | GS | 18 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 1-3 |
| FEB 22 | @ VMI | W 94–70 | GS | 35 | 26 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10-13 | 2-3 | 4-5 |
| FEB 24 | @ UNC Greensboro | L 59–60 | GS | 13 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 2-3 |
| MAR 2 | vs Western Carolina | W 81–74 | GS | 36 | 20 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6-10 | 0-1 | 8-16 |
| MAR 9 | vs Chattanooga | W 68–64 | GS | 34 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6-12 | 0-1 | 0-2 |
| MAR 10 | @ Wofford | L 72–81 | GS | 33 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.