AUSTIN WILLIAMS
01/Season by season
5 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Rutgers | 26 | 413 | 103 | 4.0 | 69 | 16 | 12 | 7 | 28 | 41-88 | 46.6% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 39.5% |
| 2021-22 | Hartford | 27 | 885 | 436 | 16.1 | 141 | 91 | 34 | 11 | 91 | 163-326 | 50.0% | 24-78 | 30.8% | 61.9% |
| 2020-21 | Hartford | 23 | 728 | 316 | 13.7 | 142 | 36 | 25 | 8 | 51 | 117-231 | 50.6% | 21-66 | 31.8% | 67.8% |
| 2018-19 | Marist | 31 | 509 | 138 | 4.5 | 75 | 35 | 22 | 4 | 47 | 55-105 | 52.4% | 2-5 | 40.0% | 49.1% |
| 2017-18 | Marist | 29 | 483 | 174 | 6.0 | 82 | 35 | 20 | 4 | 63 | 68-143 | 47.6% | 5-31 | 16.1% | 56.9% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 5 seasons | 136 | 3,018 | 1,167 | 8.6 | 509 | 213 | 113 | 34 | 280 | 444-893 | 49.7% | 58-196 | 29.6% | 58.5% |
02/2021-22 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 10 | @ Wagner | L 59–77 | GS | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| NOV 12 | @ Campbell | L 67–68 | GS | 36 | 13 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-12 | 0-2 | 1-2 |
| NOV 13 | @ Army | L 79–86 | GS | 30 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5-10 | 0-2 | 8-12 |
| NOV 24 | @ Merrimack | L 60–75 | GS | 39 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4-9 | 0-2 | 2-3 |
| NOV 29 | @ App State | L 59–69 | GS | 38 | 19 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 5-12 | 2-5 | 7-10 |
| DEC 2 | @ Winthrop | L 75–82 | GS | 37 | 21 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 8-17 | 0-3 | 5-7 |
| DEC 5 | @ St. Francis Brooklyn | W 68–55 | GS | 38 | 22 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 10-13 | 0-0 | 2-7 |
| DEC 11 | @ UNLV | L 78–95 | GS | 23 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 3-5 |
| DEC 18 | @ Central Connecticut | L 65–75 | GS | 32 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6-11 | 0-1 | 2-5 |
| JAN 20 | vs New Hampshire | W 69–57 | GS | 38 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6-14 | 2-5 | 4-7 |
| JAN 23 | @ Vermont | L 72–82 | GS | 40 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 9-15 | 2-3 | 4-4 |
| JAN 25 | @ Binghamton | L 64–74 | GS | 32 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6-10 | 1-2 | 3-4 |
| JAN 27 | vs Binghamton | W 72–60 | GS | 24 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4-13 | 0-4 | 2-2 |
| FEB 1 | @ Maine | W 78–66 | GS | 39 | 20 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 4-5 |
| FEB 3 | @ New Hampshire | L 64–70 | GS | 39 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5-18 | 1-4 | 4-4 |
| FEB 5 | vs UAlbany | L 52–71 | GS | 28 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3-6 | 1-1 | 2-4 |
| FEB 10 | @ UMBC | L 64–68 | GS | 37 | 24 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 9-17 | 4-7 | 2-2 |
| FEB 13 | @ NJIT | W 65–49 | GS | 22 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-13 | 3-5 | 1-2 |
| FEB 15 | vs Vermont | W 75–74 | GS | 44 | 34 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 13-21 | 4-6 | 4-7 |
| FEB 17 | vs Maine | W 75–65 | GS | 39 | 21 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9-16 | 0-1 | 3-5 |
| FEB 19 | @ Stony Brook | L 82–88 | GS | 39 | 27 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11-23 | 1-8 | 4-4 |
| FEB 20 | vs Stony Brook | W 74–70 | GS | 39 | 16 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-10 | 2-5 | 6-19 |
| FEB 24 | vs UMBC | L 85–92 | GS | 24 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 3-4 |
| FEB 26 | vs NJIT | W 83–62 | GS | 20 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 3-4 |
| MAR 6 | vs UAlbany | W 61–49 | GS | 23 | 14 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5-9 | 0-1 | 4-6 |
| MAR 10 | @ UMBC | L 60–80 | GS | 38 | 12 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6-14 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.