DAEJON DAVIS
01/Season by season
5 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Washington | 26 | 743 | 182 | 7.0 | 74 | 74 | 51 | 13 | 47 | 62-177 | 35.0% | 26-87 | 29.9% | 69.6% |
| 2020-21 | Stanford | 13 | 353 | 134 | 10.3 | 42 | 38 | 13 | 0 | 26 | 45-100 | 45.0% | 14-39 | 35.9% | 81.1% |
| 2019-20 | Stanford | 32 | 1,051 | 282 | 8.8 | 103 | 117 | 55 | 12 | 84 | 108-263 | 41.1% | 28-87 | 32.2% | 63.3% |
| 2018-19 | Stanford | 26 | 788 | 296 | 11.4 | 78 | 114 | 39 | 7 | 82 | 98-230 | 42.6% | 28-82 | 34.1% | 75.8% |
| 2017-18 | Stanford | 31 | 945 | 332 | 10.7 | 133 | 149 | 38 | 6 | 125 | 111-229 | 48.5% | 22-55 | 40.0% | 67.2% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 5 seasons | 128 | 3,880 | 1,226 | 9.6 | 430 | 492 | 196 | 38 | 364 | 424-999 | 42.4% | 118-350 | 33.7% | 70.5% |
02/2021-22 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 10 | vs Northern Illinois | L 64–71 | GS | 24 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1-10 | 0-4 | 1-1 |
| NOV 12 | vs Northern Arizona | W 73–62 | GS | 30 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3-9 | 1-2 | 3-4 |
| NOV 16 | vs Texas Southern | W 72–65 | GS | 32 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4-7 | 2-5 | 5-7 |
| NOV 19 | vs Wyoming | L 72–77 | GS | 18 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-7 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| NOV 23 | vs George Mason | W 77–74 | GS | 34 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 3-4 |
| NOV 24 | @ South Dakota State | W 87–76 | GS | 39 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3-10 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| NOV 25 | vs Nevada | L 62–81 | GS | 25 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 2-3 |
| NOV 28 | vs Winthrop | L 74–82 | GS | 37 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7-12 | 5-8 | 2-2 |
| DEC 19 | vs Seattle U | W 64–56 | GS | 35 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-3 | 4-4 |
| DEC 22 | vs Utah Valley | L 52–68 | GS | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-7 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| JAN 4 | @ Arizona | L 79–95 | GS | 31 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2-8 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| JAN 7 | @ Utah | W 74–68 | GS | 38 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7-12 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| JAN 9 | @ Colorado | L 64–78 | GS | 35 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-10 | 1-6 | 0-2 |
| JAN 13 | vs California | W 64–55 | GS | 35 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3-6 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| JAN 15 | vs Stanford | W 67–64 | GS | 35 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-7 | 1-5 | 2-2 |
| JAN 21 | @ Oregon State | W 82–72 | GS | 31 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3-8 | 1-4 | 0-2 |
| JAN 24 | @ Oregon | L 56–84 | GS | 22 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2-7 | 0-4 | 2-2 |
| JAN 28 | vs Colorado | W 60–58 | GS | 31 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 1-1 |
| JAN 29 | vs Utah | W 77–73 | GS | 38 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| FEB 4 | @ California | W 84–63 | GS | 33 | 19 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-10 | 5-7 | 0-0 |
| FEB 6 | @ Stanford | L 69–87 | GS | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 26 | vs Washington State | W 78–70 | — | 27 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 3-6 |
| MAR 1 | vs UCLA | L 66–77 | — | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| MAR 6 | vs Oregon State | W 78–67 | GS | 27 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| MAR 10 | vs Utah | W 82–70 | GS | 28 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| MAR 11 | @ USC | L 61–65 | GS | 24 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0-6 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.