ELIJAH MUHAMMAD
01/Season by season
2 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Tennessee Tech | 32 | 1,027 | 382 | 11.9 | 128 | 143 | 44 | 1 | 100 | 125-297 | 42.1% | 44-107 | 41.1% | 83.8% |
| 2008-09 | Tennessee Tech | 30 | 610 | 153 | 5.1 | 98 | 83 | 39 | 2 | 40 | 50-149 | 33.6% | 11-47 | 23.4% | 80.8% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 2 seasons | 62 | 1,637 | 535 | 8.6 | 226 | 226 | 83 | 3 | 140 | 175-446 | 39.2% | 55-154 | 35.7% | 82.8% |
02/2009-10 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 14 | @ Minnesota | L 50–87 | GS | 26 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3-11 | 2-5 | 1-2 |
| NOV 17 | @ Central Arkansas | W 71–67 | — | 35 | 16 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6-12 | 2-3 | 2-3 |
| NOV 20 | @ Lipscomb | W 92–89 | — | 36 | 11 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-15 | 0-2 | 1-2 |
| NOV 21 | @ Memphis | L 59–92 | GS | 22 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 1-2 |
| NOV 24 | vs Oakland | L 56–77 | — | 29 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3-11 | 0-3 | 2-2 |
| NOV 26 | @ Southern Utah | W 72–65 | — | 32 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 5-10 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| NOV 28 | @ Kansas | L 75–112 | GS | 24 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1-7 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| DEC 2 | vs Evansville | L 90–91 | GS | 43 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-8 | 0-2 | 6-7 |
| DEC 5 | @ Jacksonville State | L 72–83 | GS | 30 | 13 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-12 | 1-3 | 4-4 |
| DEC 12 | vs Ball State | W 86–81 | — | 26 | 13 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5-7 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| DEC 20 | vs Bryan (TN) | W 97–37 | GS | 29 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| DEC 31 | vs Union (KY) | W 95–32 | GS | 24 | 17 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5-11 | 3-5 | 4-4 |
| JAN 3 | @ Southeast Missouri State | W 82–73 | — | 22 | 18 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 4-9 | 2-3 | 8-8 |
| JAN 5 | @ Eastern Illinois | L 93–97 | GS | 35 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| JAN 8 | vs Morehead State | L 64–77 | GS | 37 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7-12 | 1-4 | 1-2 |
| JAN 10 | vs Eastern Kentucky | L 73–78 | GS | 38 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-9 | 2-6 | 0-0 |
| JAN 15 | @ UT Martin | W 76–63 | GS | 31 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-9 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 17 | @ Murray State | L 66–88 | GS | 35 | 20 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6-9 | 1-1 | 7-8 |
| JAN 22 | vs Austin Peay | W 94–90 | GS | 35 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 7-8 |
| JAN 24 | vs Tennessee State | W 61–56 | GS | 33 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0-7 | 0-3 | 4-4 |
| JAN 29 | vs Eastern Illinois | W 75–65 | — | 32 | 18 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 6-9 | 1-3 | 5-5 |
| JAN 31 | vs Southeast Missouri State | W 82–68 | GS | 33 | 17 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6-9 | 2-3 | 3-4 |
| FEB 5 | @ Eastern Kentucky | L 58–76 | GS | 32 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 4-4 |
| FEB 7 | @ Morehead State | L 75–84 | GS | 38 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1-7 | 1-5 | 2-4 |
| FEB 12 | vs Murray State | L 62–94 | — | 29 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-10 | 1-4 | 3-3 |
| FEB 13 | vs UT Martin | W 70–61 | GS | 21 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 7-8 |
| FEB 16 | @ Tennessee State | L 102–109 | GS | 46 | 26 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8-18 | 3-8 | 7-10 |
| FEB 19 | @ Austin Peay | L 72–77 | GS | 40 | 15 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6-14 | 1-4 | 2-3 |
| FEB 21 | @ App State | L 68–81 | GS | 32 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-10 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| FEB 28 | vs Jacksonville State | W 72–62 | GS | 35 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3-10 | 1-1 | 3-4 |
| MAR 3 | @ Austin Peay | W 68–65 | — | 34 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| MAR 6 | @ Morehead State | L 47–76 | GS | 33 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.