SEAN MOSLEY
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Maryland | 26 | 847 | 253 | 9.7 | 127 | 58 | 27 | 14 | 46 | 78-206 | 37.9% | 25-74 | 33.8% | 84.7% |
| 2010-11 | Maryland | 33 | 812 | 267 | 8.1 | 126 | 71 | 41 | 9 | 63 | 97-235 | 41.3% | 14-52 | 26.9% | 76.6% |
| 2009-10 | Maryland | 30 | 851 | 314 | 10.5 | 156 | 80 | 44 | 12 | 51 | 109-212 | 51.4% | 14-34 | 41.2% | 80.4% |
| 2008-09 | Maryland | 33 | 652 | 175 | 5.3 | 123 | 45 | 29 | 9 | 41 | 59-158 | 37.3% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 73.2% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 122 | 3,162 | 1,009 | 8.3 | 532 | 254 | 141 | 44 | 201 | 343-811 | 42.3% | 58-180 | 32.2% | 79.1% |
02/2011-12 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 14 | vs UNC Wilmington | W 71–62 | GS | 30 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-8 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| NOV 26 | vs Florida Gulf Coast | W 73–67 | GS | 35 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| NOV 30 | vs Illinois | L 62–71 | GS | 34 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| DEC 8 | vs Mount St. Mary's | W 77–74 | GS | 34 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-3 | 4-4 |
| DEC 8 | vs Mount St. Mary's | W 77–74 | GS | 34 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-3 | 4-4 |
| DEC 15 | vs Florida International | W 65–61 | GS | 35 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5-11 | 0-3 | 2-3 |
| DEC 24 | vs Radford | W 65–60 | GS | 28 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| DEC 29 | vs UAlbany | W 83–72 | GS | 31 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 1-1 |
| DEC 31 | vs Samford | W 75–63 | GS | 23 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3-9 | 0-2 | 1-2 |
| JAN 4 | vs Cornell | W 70–62 | GS | 28 | 19 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6-9 | 2-4 | 5-6 |
| JAN 8 | @ NC State | L 74–79 | GS | 34 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 1-1 |
| JAN 12 | vs Wake Forest | W 70–64 | GS | 29 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-11 | 2-3 | 1-2 |
| JAN 15 | vs Georgia Tech | W 61–50 | GS | 29 | 18 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-8 | 2-2 | 10-10 |
| JAN 18 | @ Florida State | L 70–84 | GS | 30 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| JAN 21 | @ Temple | L 60–73 | GS | 30 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0-5 | 0-1 | 3-5 |
| JAN 26 | vs Duke | L 61–74 | GS | 31 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-8 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| JAN 28 | vs Virginia Tech | W 73–69 | GS | 32 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4-7 | 2-4 | 5-5 |
| FEB 2 | @ Miami | L 86–90 | GS | 44 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-7 | 0-3 | 5-6 |
| FEB 4 | vs North Carolina | L 74–83 | GS | 23 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 4-4 |
| FEB 8 | @ Clemson | W 64–62 | GS | 34 | 16 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5-9 | 3-3 | 3-4 |
| FEB 11 | @ Duke | L 55–73 | GS | 38 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2-9 | 0-5 | 1-1 |
| FEB 17 | vs Boston College | W 81–65 | GS | 38 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 6-7 |
| FEB 18 | @ Virginia | L 44–71 | GS | 30 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
| FEB 22 | vs Miami | W 75–70 | GS | 36 | 15 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-10 | 1-4 | 6-6 |
| FEB 25 | @ Georgia Tech | L 61–63 | GS | 36 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-10 | 4-5 | 2-2 |
| MAR 1 | @ North Carolina | L 64–88 | GS | 31 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1-9 | 0-3 | 2-2 |
| MAR 4 | vs Virginia | L 72–75 | GS | 44 | 17 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-15 | 1-4 | 4-5 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.