REGGIE JACKSON
01/Season by season
3 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Boston College | 32 | 1,089 | 588 | 18.4 | 136 | 145 | 35 | 18 | 73 | 208-414 | 50.2% | 67-160 | 41.9% | 78.9% |
| 2009-10 | Boston College | 31 | 934 | 399 | 12.9 | 176 | 139 | 19 | 14 | 80 | 145-337 | 43.0% | 32-110 | 29.1% | 73.3% |
| 2008-09 | Boston College | 33 | 661 | 233 | 7.1 | 107 | 55 | 25 | 14 | 40 | 89-202 | 44.1% | 18-65 | 27.7% | 68.5% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 3 seasons | 96 | 2,684 | 1,220 | 12.7 | 419 | 339 | 79 | 46 | 193 | 442-953 | 46.4% | 117-335 | 34.9% | 75.0% |
02/2010-11 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 13 | vs St. Francis Brooklyn | W 79–49 | GS | 29 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6-10 | 1-4 | 4-4 |
| NOV 19 | vs Yale | L 67–75 | GS | 39 | 30 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10-22 | 3-8 | 7-7 |
| NOV 23 | vs Holy Cross | W 69–54 | GS | 35 | 9 | 4 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4-12 | 1-5 | 0-1 |
| NOV 25 | @ Texas A&M | W 67–65 | GS | 34 | 21 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8-12 | 3-5 | 2-2 |
| NOV 26 | @ Wisconsin | L 55–65 | GS | 37 | 18 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-21 | 2-6 | 4-4 |
| NOV 28 | @ California | W 68–46 | GS | 33 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 4-4 |
| DEC 2 | vs Indiana | W 88–76 | GS | 37 | 27 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9-14 | 3-6 | 6-8 |
| DEC 4 | @ Massachusetts | W 76–71 | GS | 26 | 17 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6-11 | 3-4 | 2-2 |
| DEC 9 | vs Providence | W 88–86 | GS | 37 | 26 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9-12 | 4-4 | 4-9 |
| DEC 12 | @ Maryland | W 79–75 | GS | 36 | 16 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 5-5 |
| DEC 19 | vs Bryant | W 93–77 | GS | 31 | 16 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7-12 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| DEC 23 | vs Bucknell | W 84–80 | GS | 36 | 22 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8-10 | 3-4 | 3-5 |
| DEC 30 | @ Rhode Island | L 65–67 | GS | 37 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 6-11 | 2-6 | 1-2 |
| JAN 1 | @ South Carolina | W 85–70 | GS | 33 | 14 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-12 | 1-5 | 1-2 |
| JAN 6 | vs Harvard | L 69–78 | GS | 38 | 18 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7-15 | 2-5 | 2-4 |
| JAN 8 | vs Georgia Tech | W 86–75 | GS | 26 | 25 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 8-9 | 3-3 | 6-6 |
| JAN 12 | vs NC State | W 75–66 | GS | 36 | 29 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 9-13 | 3-6 | 8-9 |
| JAN 15 | @ Miami | L 71–72 | GS | 32 | 22 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7-16 | 3-7 | 5-7 |
| JAN 20 | vs Virginia | W 70–67 | GS | 33 | 16 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-12 | 2-6 | 6-6 |
| JAN 23 | @ Florida State | L 51–67 | GS | 39 | 13 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-13 | 1-5 | 4-6 |
| JAN 28 | @ Duke | L 68–84 | — | 32 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-11 | 0-4 | 1-2 |
| FEB 2 | vs North Carolina | L 74–106 | GS | 31 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2-10 | 0-3 | 2-2 |
| FEB 5 | vs Virginia Tech | W 58–56 | GS | 28 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4-13 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| FEB 9 | @ Clemson | L 69–77 | GS | 35 | 27 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10-20 | 3-9 | 4-5 |
| FEB 12 | vs Maryland | W 76–72 | GS | 36 | 31 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 12-16 | 5-7 | 2-2 |
| FEB 19 | @ North Carolina | L 46–48 | GS | 38 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5-19 | 2-8 | 1-1 |
| FEB 24 | vs Miami | L 64–73 | GS | 35 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-14 | 1-6 | 4-4 |
| FEB 26 | @ Virginia | W 63–44 | GS | 39 | 25 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10-16 | 3-6 | 2-2 |
| MAR 2 | @ Virginia Tech | W 76–61 | GS | 37 | 20 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-12 | 3-6 | 7-8 |
| MAR 6 | vs Wake Forest | W 84–68 | — | 20 | 14 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5-6 | 2-2 | 2-2 |
| MAR 10 | vs Wake Forest | W 81–67 | GS | 36 | 27 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10-13 | 2-4 | 5-8 |
| MAR 11 | @ Clemson | L 47–70 | GS | 38 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5-13 | 1-6 | 0-2 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.