LAVAR HAREWOOD
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Portland | 22 | 210 | 49 | 2.2 | 31 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 9 | 12-42 | 28.6% | 6-27 | 22.2% | 67.9% |
| 2018-19 | South Carolina State | 24 | 582 | 211 | 8.8 | 78 | 19 | 21 | 2 | 28 | 71-171 | 41.5% | 42-107 | 39.3% | 77.1% |
| 2017-18 | South Carolina State | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | — | 0-0 | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Maine | 28 | 405 | 142 | 5.1 | 71 | 25 | 22 | 7 | 33 | 42-131 | 32.1% | 19-58 | 32.8% | 70.9% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 75 | 1,197 | 402 | 5.4 | 180 | 49 | 48 | 10 | 70 | 125-344 | 36.3% | 67-192 | 34.9% | 72.0% |
02/2015-16 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 14 | @ UConn | L 56–100 | — | 9 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-4 |
| NOV 20 | @ Long Island University | L 79–84 | — | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| NOV 21 | @ Wagner | L 73–87 | — | 21 | 14 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4-11 | 1-5 | 5-7 |
| NOV 25 | vs Longwood | W 92–82 | — | 16 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-6 | 1-4 | 1-4 |
| NOV 29 | @ Central Connecticut | W 81–74 | GS | 17 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 4-4 |
| DEC 3 | vs Army | L 71–84 | GS | 18 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-7 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| DEC 5 | @ Marquette | L 67–104 | GS | 21 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2-7 | 2-3 | 4-6 |
| DEC 10 | vs Dartmouth | L 69–79 | — | 14 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-6 | 3-5 | 1-1 |
| DEC 13 | @ Boston College | L 60–91 | — | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| DEC 19 | @ Fordham | L 53–70 | — | 15 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 22 | @ Holy Cross | L 75–76 | — | 23 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 4-8 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| DEC 30 | vs Quinnipiac | W 98–95 | GS | 24 | 16 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-7 | 3-3 | 3-4 |
| JAN 2 | vs Brown | W 98–92 | GS | 15 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 7 | vs Vermont | L 72–90 | GS | 13 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| JAN 9 | @ UMBC | L 76–89 | GS | 25 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-11 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| JAN 13 | @ UMass Lowell | W 95–81 | — | 13 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-7 | 0-3 | 3-4 |
| JAN 15 | vs UAlbany | W 81–79 | — | 7 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 19 | vs New Hampshire | L 91–99 | — | 13 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| JAN 26 | @ Stony Brook | L 54–81 | — | 15 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 2-4 |
| JAN 28 | @ Hartford | W 105–100 | — | 9 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 30 | vs Binghamton | W 74–63 | — | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| FEB 9 | @ New Hampshire | L 75–88 | — | 9 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| FEB 11 | vs UMass Lowell | L 95–108 | — | 13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 2-3 |
| FEB 14 | @ UAlbany | L 64–108 | GS | 19 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 21 | vs Stony Brook | L 56–75 | — | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 25 | vs Hartford | L 74–82 | — | 13 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| FEB 27 | @ Binghamton | L 66–78 | — | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
| MAR 3 | @ Vermont | L 82–99 | — | 22 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.