DAN MAVRAIDES
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Princeton | 31 | 1,020 | 393 | 12.7 | 143 | 87 | 34 | 4 | 86 | 120-306 | 39.2% | 59-153 | 38.6% | 79.7% |
| 2009-10 | Princeton | 28 | 856 | 331 | 11.8 | 122 | 42 | 33 | 2 | 46 | 104-259 | 40.2% | 53-145 | 36.6% | 79.5% |
| 2008-09 | Princeton | 27 | 738 | 279 | 10.3 | 83 | 17 | 30 | 4 | 36 | 89-221 | 40.3% | 46-108 | 42.6% | 78.6% |
| 2007-08 | Princeton | 7 | 27 | 11 | 1.6 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2-8 | 25.0% | 1-5 | 20.0% | 100.0% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 93 | 2,641 | 1,014 | 10.9 | 352 | 146 | 100 | 10 | 169 | 315-794 | 39.7% | 159-411 | 38.7% | 79.8% |
02/2008-09 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 15 | vs Central Michigan | L 53–55 | — | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1-8 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| NOV 20 | vs Maine | L 55–58 | — | 37 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-12 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| NOV 23 | @ Army | W 55–43 | — | 11 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| NOV 27 | @ Fordham | W 73–61 | — | 9 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 3 | vs South Carolina | L 58–84 | — | 23 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 3-7 | 2-6 | 7-9 |
| DEC 7 | @ St. Bonaventure | L 53–60 | — | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 11 | vs Rutgers | L 44–49 | — | 25 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| DEC 14 | @ Manhattan | L 60–70 | — | 20 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| DEC 20 | @ Central Connecticut | L 56–67 | — | 25 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5-11 | 2-6 | 1-1 |
| DEC 31 | @ Lafayette | L 53–54 | GS | 26 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-13 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| JAN 3 | vs UNC Greensboro | W 65–55 | GS | 35 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-11 | 1-4 | 6-6 |
| JAN 8 | vs Lehigh | W 73–64 | GS | 35 | 21 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5-12 | 4-8 | 7-10 |
| JAN 25 | vs Concordia College (NY) | W 64–36 | GS | 24 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1-7 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| JAN 31 | @ Dartmouth | W 59–54 | GS | 34 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-14 | 3-5 | 0-2 |
| FEB 1 | @ Harvard | W 77–71 | GS | 37 | 22 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-8 | 4-6 | 6-6 |
| FEB 7 | vs Columbia | W 63–35 | GS | 23 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2-7 | 2-5 | 2-2 |
| FEB 7 | vs Cornell | W 61–41 | GS | 35 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4-10 | 3-5 | 1-2 |
| FEB 14 | @ Yale | L 48–60 | GS | 22 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| FEB 15 | @ Brown | L 43–61 | — | 28 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-6 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| FEB 18 | vs Pennsylvania | T 55–55 | GS | 43 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| FEB 21 | vs Dartmouth | L 63–66 | GS | 37 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6-12 | 1-4 | 6-7 |
| FEB 21 | vs Harvard | W 58–55 | GS | 21 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 6-8 |
| FEB 28 | vs Brown | W 56–48 | GS | 35 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5-9 | 4-6 | 0-1 |
| FEB 28 | vs Yale | W 62–54 | GS | 35 | 16 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6-10 | 2-3 | 2-2 |
| MAR 7 | @ Columbia | L 44–58 | GS | 30 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 1-2 |
| MAR 8 | @ Cornell | L 51–60 | — | 26 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-9 | 1-4 | 1-2 |
| MAR 11 | @ Pennsylvania | W 59–44 | GS | 36 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-11 | 2-6 | 5-5 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.