DARRYL SHAZIER
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Bucknell | 33 | 1,053 | 275 | 8.3 | 118 | 185 | 45 | 0 | 49 | 95-229 | 41.5% | 31-87 | 35.6% | 75.0% |
| 2009-10 | Bucknell | 31 | 1,090 | 314 | 10.1 | 98 | 118 | 36 | 7 | 50 | 103-253 | 40.7% | 42-128 | 32.8% | 75.0% |
| 2008-09 | Bucknell | 30 | 1,082 | 235 | 7.8 | 102 | 138 | 30 | 6 | 67 | 79-217 | 36.4% | 37-100 | 37.0% | 67.8% |
| 2007-08 | Bucknell | 30 | 619 | 95 | 3.2 | 37 | 55 | 29 | 3 | 52 | 34-116 | 29.3% | 10-42 | 23.8% | 60.7% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 124 | 3,844 | 919 | 7.4 | 355 | 496 | 140 | 16 | 218 | 311-815 | 38.2% | 120-357 | 33.6% | 71.7% |
02/2009-10 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 13 | vs Mercer | L 80–89 | GS | 38 | 17 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-7 | 2-3 | 5-7 |
| NOV 14 | @ Providence | L 65–76 | GS | 37 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5-10 | 0-3 | 2-2 |
| NOV 15 | @ Bryant | W 59–56 | GS | 33 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-6 | 0-3 | 4-4 |
| NOV 19 | @ Delaware | W 82–66 | GS | 33 | 24 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6-10 | 3-4 | 9-9 |
| NOV 25 | @ Columbia | L 59–73 | GS | 31 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-6 | 0-3 | 2-2 |
| NOV 29 | @ Wagner | W 85–61 | GS | 36 | 17 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-11 | 3-7 | 2-3 |
| DEC 3 | vs Cornell | L 98–104 | GS | 41 | 22 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8-15 | 4-6 | 2-4 |
| DEC 5 | @ Binghamton | L 60–64 | GS | 35 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 4-4 |
| DEC 6 | @ Boston University | L 53–63 | GS | 35 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-9 | 1-6 | 1-2 |
| DEC 19 | @ La Salle | L 70–83 | GS | 31 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| DEC 23 | @ Notre Dame | L 69–101 | GS | 29 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-11 | 1-5 | 1-2 |
| DEC 29 | vs Loyola Maryland | L 49–55 | GS | 35 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-9 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| DEC 31 | vs Marist | W 70–67 | GS | 41 | 16 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-10 | 3-7 | 3-4 |
| JAN 2 | vs Richmond | L 50–59 | GS | 38 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-9 | 1-7 | 2-2 |
| JAN 5 | @ Dartmouth | L 43–49 | GS | 33 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 10 | vs Navy | L 67–69 | GS | 36 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 3-4 |
| JAN 14 | vs American University | W 72–68 | GS | 36 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2-7 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
| JAN 16 | @ Holy Cross | L 69–82 | — | 38 | 16 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6-11 | 1-4 | 3-5 |
| JAN 21 | @ Lafayette | L 57–61 | GS | 28 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| JAN 23 | @ Colgate | W 62–61 | GS | 36 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| JAN 28 | vs Lehigh | W 81–76 | — | 43 | 13 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4-13 | 0-5 | 5-6 |
| JAN 31 | vs Army | W 55–48 | GS | 35 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| FEB 6 | @ Navy | L 79–81 | GS | 34 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4-8 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| FEB 12 | @ American University | W 73–59 | — | 34 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 1-2 |
| FEB 14 | vs Holy Cross | W 68–63 | GS | 34 | 27 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 9-13 | 4-7 | 5-7 |
| FEB 18 | vs Lafayette | W 78–67 | GS | 36 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1-6 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| FEB 21 | vs Colgate | W 69–49 | GS | 34 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| FEB 25 | @ Lehigh | L 59–81 | — | 34 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-7 | 0-5 | 1-3 |
| FEB 28 | @ Army | W 62–51 | GS | 37 | 19 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5-7 | 2-4 | 7-8 |
| MAR 4 | vs Holy Cross | L 64–67 | GS | 35 | 19 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7-11 | 5-9 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.