DEMONTEZ STITT
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Clemson | 30 | 1,023 | 440 | 14.7 | 133 | 101 | 41 | 12 | 62 | 143-327 | 43.7% | 43-118 | 36.4% | 73.0% |
| 2009-10 | Clemson | 29 | 840 | 322 | 11.1 | 77 | 92 | 44 | 8 | 76 | 112-251 | 44.6% | 29-79 | 36.7% | 78.4% |
| 2008-09 | Clemson | 31 | 805 | 276 | 8.9 | 73 | 115 | 47 | 14 | 78 | 92-219 | 42.0% | 18-65 | 27.7% | 67.3% |
| 2007-08 | Clemson | 31 | 701 | 267 | 8.6 | 49 | 95 | 28 | 9 | 85 | 87-216 | 40.3% | 12-54 | 22.2% | 75.7% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 121 | 3,369 | 1,305 | 10.8 | 332 | 403 | 160 | 43 | 301 | 434-1,013 | 42.8% | 102-316 | 32.3% | 73.3% |
02/2009-10 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 14 | vs Presbyterian | W 84–41 | GS | 22 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| NOV 17 | @ Liberty | W 79–39 | GS | 25 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| NOV 21 | @ UNC Greensboro | W 89–67 | GS | 21 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| NOV 24 | vs Winthrop | W 102–66 | GS | 22 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-9 | 0-2 | 1-3 |
| NOV 26 | vs Texas A&M | L 60–69 | GS | 29 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1-8 | 0-2 | 3-4 |
| NOV 27 | @ Long Beach State | W 87–79 | GS | 34 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-14 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| NOV 30 | @ Butler | W 70–69 | GS | 36 | 19 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7-15 | 3-7 | 2-4 |
| DEC 3 | vs Illinois | L 74–76 | GS | 35 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4-11 | 2-5 | 5-6 |
| DEC 6 | vs South Carolina | W 72–61 | GS | 35 | 14 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5-8 | 2-3 | 2-2 |
| DEC 13 | vs Furman | W 82–53 | GS | 24 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 3-4 |
| DEC 17 | @ East Carolina | W 80–63 | GS | 21 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 1-1 |
| DEC 20 | vs Charleston | W 94–55 | GS | 24 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-5 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| DEC 23 | vs Western Carolina | W 79–57 | GS | 31 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4-10 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| DEC 30 | vs South Carolina State | W 70–67 | GS | 30 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-8 | 1-1 | 4-4 |
| JAN 4 | @ Duke | L 53–74 | GS | 32 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-10 | 1-3 | 8-9 |
| JAN 9 | vs Boston College | W 72–56 | GS | 27 | 15 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-8 | 2-2 | 3-4 |
| JAN 14 | vs North Carolina | W 83–64 | GS | 26 | 20 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8-14 | 1-4 | 3-3 |
| JAN 16 | @ NC State | W 73–70 | GS | 23 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-3 | 3-4 |
| JAN 20 | @ Georgia Tech | L 64–66 | GS | 36 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4-10 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
| JAN 24 | vs Duke | L 47–60 | GS | 34 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-12 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| FEB 6 | @ Virginia Tech | L 59–70 | — | 27 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1-6 | 1-2 | 0-3 |
| FEB 11 | vs Florida State | W 77–67 | GS | 30 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 4-4 |
| FEB 13 | vs Miami | W 74–66 | GS | 33 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-9 | 3-5 | 4-4 |
| FEB 20 | vs Virginia | W 72–49 | GS | 23 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
| FEB 25 | @ Maryland | L 79–88 | GS | 33 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6-12 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
| FEB 28 | @ Florida State | W 53–50 | GS | 31 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 4-4 |
| MAR 3 | vs Georgia Tech | W 91–80 | GS | 36 | 20 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 6-10 | 4-6 | 4-4 |
| MAR 7 | @ Wake Forest | L 65–70 | GS | 28 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-12 | 0-5 | 6-8 |
| MAR 12 | vs NC State | L 57–59 | GS | 32 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.