MICHAEL HUNTER
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | UC Irvine | 32 | 937 | 441 | 13.8 | 77 | 75 | 42 | 2 | 68 | 140-346 | 40.5% | 80-221 | 36.2% | 87.1% |
| 2008-09 | UC Irvine | 30 | 919 | 357 | 11.9 | 49 | 74 | 45 | 3 | 69 | 117-275 | 42.5% | 67-171 | 39.2% | 87.5% |
| 2007-08 | UC Irvine | 33 | 873 | 291 | 8.8 | 82 | 74 | 41 | 2 | 61 | 101-234 | 43.2% | 55-136 | 40.4% | 66.7% |
| 2006-07 | UC Irvine | 30 | 658 | 201 | 6.7 | 72 | 72 | 30 | 3 | 84 | 68-153 | 44.4% | 31-72 | 43.1% | 68.0% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 125 | 3,387 | 1,290 | 10.3 | 280 | 295 | 158 | 10 | 282 | 426-1,008 | 42.3% | 233-600 | 38.8% | 79.5% |
02/2006-07 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 11 | vs South Alabama | L 63–67 | — | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| NOV 12 | @ Winston-Salem | W 53–41 | — | 17 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| NOV 13 | @ Fresno State | L 51–82 | — | 15 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 1-1 |
| NOV 15 | vs South Carolina | W 67–52 | — | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| NOV 18 | @ Oregon | L 42–85 | — | 9 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| NOV 26 | vs Pepperdine | W 68–66 | — | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| DEC 13 | @ Drake | L 73–76 | — | 27 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4-8 | 3-3 | 2-4 |
| DEC 17 | vs Sam Houston | W 70–62 | — | 19 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-7 | 0-4 | 1-1 |
| DEC 21 | @ DePaul | L 53–65 | — | 16 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| DEC 23 | @ Loyola Chicago | L 69–72 | — | 26 | 12 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5-8 | 1-3 | 1-1 |
| DEC 29 | vs Harvard | W 81–48 | — | 18 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 31 | @ UC Davis | W 68–48 | — | 29 | 18 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6-7 | 1-2 | 5-6 |
| JAN 5 | vs Cal Poly | W 66–62 | — | 15 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 7 | vs UC Santa Barbara | L 59–64 | — | 27 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3-10 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| JAN 12 | @ Cal State Northridge | L 61–67 | — | 25 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1-5 | 1-1 | 4-4 |
| JAN 14 | @ Pacific | W 67–42 | — | 30 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| JAN 21 | vs Cal State Fullerton | L 68–71 | — | 15 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 26 | vs Long Beach State | W 88–84 | — | 28 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 4-8 | 2-5 | 2-2 |
| JAN 28 | @ Cal State Fullerton | L 60–75 | — | 28 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| FEB 2 | vs Pacific | L 82–89 | GS | 26 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 3-6 |
| FEB 4 | vs Cal State Northridge | W 75–66 | — | 23 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-3 |
| FEB 9 | @ UC Santa Barbara | L 62–71 | — | 17 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 11 | @ Cal Poly | L 80–89 | — | 27 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| FEB 15 | @ UC Riverside | W 66–61 | — | 21 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 4-4 |
| FEB 17 | @ San Francisco | L 62–76 | — | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| FEB 23 | vs UC Davis | W 73–59 | — | 23 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| MAR 2 | @ Long Beach State | L 80–85 | — | 27 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-9 | 3-4 | 4-5 |
| MAR 8 | vs UC Riverside | W 53–52 | — | 36 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
| MAR 9 | @ UC Santa Barbara | W 70–52 | — | 32 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6-11 | 3-6 | 1-2 |
| MAR 10 | @ Long Beach State | L 63–77 | GS | 35 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.