DINOS MITOGLOU
01/Season by season
3 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Wake Forest | 32 | 782 | 288 | 9.0 | 200 | 29 | 19 | 22 | 49 | 92-216 | 42.6% | 28-83 | 33.7% | 80.0% |
| 2015-16 | Wake Forest | 31 | 738 | 286 | 9.2 | 167 | 22 | 15 | 24 | 44 | 94-220 | 42.7% | 42-132 | 31.8% | 76.7% |
| 2014-15 | Wake Forest | 32 | 713 | 309 | 9.7 | 146 | 13 | 16 | 19 | 35 | 103-233 | 44.2% | 52-135 | 38.5% | 71.8% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 3 seasons | 95 | 2,233 | 883 | 9.3 | 513 | 64 | 50 | 65 | 128 | 289-669 | 43.2% | 122-350 | 34.9% | 76.6% |
02/2016-17 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 12 | vs Radford | W 80–59 | GS | 26 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4-7 | 0-2 | 1-3 |
| NOV 13 | vs Bucknell | W 94–74 | GS | 21 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 3-3 |
| NOV 17 | @ UTEP | W 103–81 | GS | 27 | 18 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5-12 | 4-6 | 4-4 |
| NOV 18 | vs Villanova | L 77–96 | GS | 28 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-9 | 0-2 | 5-5 |
| NOV 21 | @ Charleston | W 78–61 | GS | 17 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-7 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| NOV 24 | vs Coastal Carolina | W 86–74 | GS | 27 | 3 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0-6 | 0-3 | 3-4 |
| NOV 29 | @ Northwestern | L 58–65 | GS | 32 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-10 | 1-5 | 2-2 |
| DEC 3 | @ Richmond | W 75–67 | GS | 25 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 3-5 | 0-2 | 5-6 |
| DEC 7 | vs Charlotte | W 91–74 | GS | 17 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 7-7 |
| DEC 10 | @ UNC Greensboro | W 78–75 | GS | 19 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-1 | 4-5 |
| DEC 18 | @ Xavier | L 65–69 | GS | 28 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-3 | 2-3 |
| DEC 23 | vs LSU | W 110–76 | GS | 31 | 28 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10-14 | 8-11 | 0-0 |
| DEC 28 | @ Florida State | L 72–88 | GS | 29 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| DEC 31 | vs Clemson | L 68–73 | GS | 23 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 4 | vs Boston College | W 79–66 | GS | 22 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 3-4 |
| JAN 9 | @ Virginia | L 62–79 | GS | 27 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| JAN 12 | vs North Carolina | L 87–93 | GS | 31 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-10 | 1-4 | 6-6 |
| JAN 19 | vs Miami | W 96–79 | GS | 16 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 1-1 |
| JAN 21 | @ NC State | W 93–88 | GS | 26 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-10 | 1-3 | 3-3 |
| JAN 25 | @ Syracuse | L 76–81 | GS | 22 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 1-2 |
| JAN 28 | vs Duke | L 83–85 | GS | 20 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| FEB 1 | @ Boston College | W 85–80 | GS | 25 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| FEB 4 | vs Georgia Tech | W 81–69 | GS | 27 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
| FEB 8 | @ Notre Dame | L 81–88 | GS | 22 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| FEB 11 | vs NC State | W 88–58 | GS | 25 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| FEB 15 | @ Clemson | L 83–95 | GS | 28 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| FEB 18 | @ Duke | L 94–99 | GS | 24 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| FEB 23 | vs Pittsburgh | W 63–59 | GS | 26 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 5-6 |
| MAR 2 | vs Louisville | W 88–81 | — | 33 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3-6 | 2-5 | 4-6 |
| MAR 4 | @ Virginia Tech | W 89–84 | GS | 20 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| MAR 7 | vs Boston College | W 92–78 | GS | 17 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 1-3 |
| MAR 9 | @ Virginia Tech | L 90–99 | GS | 21 | 12 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 3-4 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.