COURTNEY BRADLEY
01/Season by season
2 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Jacksonville State | 29 | 943 | 488 | 16.8 | 196 | 32 | 40 | 7 | 84 | 178-383 | 46.5% | 31-86 | 36.0% | 78.9% |
| 2005-06 | Jacksonville State | 29 | 879 | 443 | 15.3 | 219 | 29 | 38 | 9 | 53 | 170-328 | 51.8% | 19-50 | 38.0% | 68.9% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 2 seasons | 58 | 1,822 | 931 | 16.1 | 415 | 61 | 78 | 16 | 137 | 348-711 | 48.9% | 50-136 | 36.8% | 74.0% |
02/2006-07 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 12 | @ New Orleans | L 54–66 | — | 36 | 17 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-11 | 1-1 | 6-6 |
| NOV 19 | vs Wofford | L 80–82 | — | 38 | 31 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 12-18 | 1-1 | 6-9 |
| NOV 22 | vs Reinhardt | W 95–72 | — | 28 | 23 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10-16 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
| NOV 26 | vs Massachusetts | L 69–100 | — | 34 | 19 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6-19 | 0-2 | 7-7 |
| DEC 2 | @ William & Mary | L 56–59 | — | 28 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 4-9 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| DEC 2 | @ VMI | W 87–85 | — | 37 | 30 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 10-16 | 0-0 | 10-11 |
| DEC 8 | vs Samford | L 53–54 | — | 31 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| DEC 10 | vs UT Martin | L 69–70 | — | 35 | 18 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7-10 | 3-4 | 1-1 |
| DEC 17 | @ Southeast Missouri State | W 70–67 | — | 31 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4-13 | 1-3 | 3-4 |
| DEC 28 | @ Green Bay | L 67–90 | — | 22 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| DEC 29 | @ Bowling Green | L 69–77 | — | 30 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| DEC 30 | vs Michigan Tech | L 58–76 | — | 32 | 21 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 8-14 | 1-3 | 4-4 |
| JAN 5 | vs Austin Peay | L 63–78 | — | 30 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 6 | @ Samford | L 63–64 | — | 37 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7-12 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 12 | @ Tennessee Tech | L 71–75 | — | 28 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2-8 | 0-2 | 4-6 |
| JAN 14 | @ Tennessee State | L 74–83 | — | 26 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-9 | 1-3 | 1-5 |
| JAN 19 | vs Eastern Kentucky | W 66–56 | — | 31 | 23 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8-13 | 4-6 | 3-3 |
| JAN 20 | vs Morehead State | W 67–62 | — | 35 | 24 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-14 | 1-5 | 9-11 |
| JAN 26 | @ Austin Peay | L 58–73 | — | 30 | 22 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 9-16 | 1-6 | 3-4 |
| JAN 28 | @ UT Martin | L 60–83 | — | 22 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2-8 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| JAN 31 | vs Tennessee State | W 72–64 | GS | 34 | 24 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9-16 | 3-5 | 3-4 |
| FEB 2 | @ Eastern Illinois | L 59–73 | — | 32 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-12 | 2-4 | 2-4 |
| FEB 4 | vs Murray State | L 61–63 | — | 37 | 23 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9-19 | 2-2 | 3-4 |
| FEB 9 | vs Tennessee Tech | W 72–71 | — | 34 | 20 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5-20 | 1-6 | 9-10 |
| FEB 14 | @ Morehead State | W 57–52 | — | 30 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-13 | 1-6 | 4-4 |
| FEB 16 | @ Eastern Kentucky | L 51–63 | — | 37 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7-16 | 0-4 | 2-3 |
| FEB 18 | @ Chattanooga | L 64–75 | — | 40 | 28 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10-17 | 4-7 | 4-6 |
| FEB 23 | vs Eastern Illinois | L 65–69 | — | 38 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7-18 | 0-2 | 6-6 |
| FEB 25 | vs Southeast Missouri State | W 78–72 | — | 40 | 28 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10-22 | 1-5 | 7-10 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.