MARK MCANDREW
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Brown | 28 | 931 | 463 | 16.5 | 140 | 57 | 37 | 1 | 76 | 135-285 | 47.4% | 61-147 | 41.5% | 82.5% |
| 2006-07 | Brown | 29 | 1,056 | 458 | 15.8 | 155 | 64 | 28 | 1 | 80 | 126-273 | 46.2% | 72-163 | 44.2% | 84.8% |
| 2005-06 | Brown | 24 | 248 | 50 | 2.1 | 28 | 23 | 12 | 0 | 19 | 15-55 | 27.3% | 7-41 | 17.1% | 72.2% |
| 2004-05 | Brown | 25 | 328 | 95 | 3.8 | 60 | 17 | 14 | 3 | 20 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 14-41 | 34.1% | 77.5% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 106 | 2,563 | 1,066 | 10.1 | 383 | 161 | 91 | 5 | 195 | 301-677 | 44.5% | 154-392 | 39.3% | 82.4% |
02/2007-08 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 9 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 74–55 | GS | 38 | 22 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6-9 | 4-5 | 6-7 |
| NOV 11 | @ Michigan | L 57–72 | — | 31 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-14 | 3-7 | 1-2 |
| NOV 15 | vs Rhode Island | L 61–75 | — | 30 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-11 | 2-4 | 2-2 |
| NOV 24 | @ Northwestern | W 73–67 | — | 35 | 18 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-9 | 5-7 | 3-4 |
| NOV 29 | vs Wagner | L 63–64 | — | 40 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-11 | 1-4 | 3-4 |
| DEC 2 | vs UC Davis | W 73–57 | — | 32 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4-8 | 0-3 | 10-12 |
| DEC 4 | @ Quinnipiac | W 86–79 | — | 36 | 21 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-15 | 1-8 | 10-12 |
| DEC 7 | vs New Hampshire | W 68–52 | — | 33 | 19 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-10 | 3-7 | 4-6 |
| DEC 10 | @ Providence | L 51–70 | — | 29 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-15 | 2-7 | 3-4 |
| DEC 22 | @ Hartford | W 79–61 | — | 35 | 16 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-12 | 2-6 | 6-7 |
| DEC 30 | @ Notre Dame | L 54–87 | GS | 25 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-7 | 2-6 | 2-2 |
| JAN 3 | @ Army | W 79–78 | GS | 38 | 15 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4-9 | 2-5 | 5-6 |
| JAN 5 | vs American University | W 68–55 | — | 29 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1-9 | 1-4 | 5-7 |
| JAN 9 | @ Baylor | L 62–72 | GS | 37 | 22 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8-13 | 5-7 | 1-2 |
| JAN 20 | @ Yale | L 63–66 | GS | 41 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4-11 | 3-6 | 4-5 |
| JAN 26 | vs Yale | W 77–68 | — | 19 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 1-2 |
| FEB 2 | vs Cornell | L 64–75 | — | 35 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 6-12 | 3-6 | 7-10 |
| FEB 3 | vs Columbia | W 68–63 | — | 29 | 21 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7-11 | 3-6 | 4-5 |
| FEB 9 | vs Dartmouth | W 77–51 | — | 32 | 25 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8-10 | 3-3 | 6-6 |
| FEB 10 | vs Harvard | W 71–51 | — | 27 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-7 | 1-3 | 3-3 |
| FEB 16 | @ Pennsylvania | W 66–54 | GS | 34 | 20 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-9 | 2-5 | 8-10 |
| FEB 17 | @ Princeton | W 65–63 | — | 42 | 20 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6-12 | 2-8 | 6-7 |
| FEB 23 | @ Columbia | W 67–52 | GS | 35 | 18 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 5-11 | 2-4 | 6-7 |
| FEB 24 | @ Cornell | L 65–74 | — | 32 | 18 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5-11 | 2-7 | 6-6 |
| MAR 1 | vs Pennsylvania | W 75–37 | — | 33 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6-10 | 2-4 | 2-2 |
| MAR 1 | vs Princeton | W 64–57 | — | 31 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 9-11 |
| MAR 8 | @ Harvard | W 78–62 | — | 37 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-10 | 2-5 | 3-3 |
| MAR 9 | @ Dartmouth | W 75–71 | GS | 36 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4-8 | 0-3 | 6-6 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.