GEORGE BROZOS
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Furman | 30 | 636 | 285 | 9.5 | 126 | 30 | 22 | 8 | 40 | 88-200 | 44.0% | 30-74 | 40.5% | 80.6% |
| 2006-07 | Furman | 29 | 316 | 95 | 3.3 | 58 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 12 | 31-83 | 37.3% | 13-44 | 29.5% | 74.1% |
| 2005-06 | Furman | 28 | 297 | 94 | 3.4 | 54 | 19 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 32-82 | 39.0% | 17-52 | 32.7% | 56.5% |
| 2004-05 | Furman | 20 | 180 | 66 | 3.3 | 20 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 13 | 23-46 | 50.0% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 75.0% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 107 | 1,429 | 540 | 5.0 | 258 | 79 | 51 | 18 | 83 | 174-411 | 42.3% | 68-191 | 35.6% | 75.6% |
02/2007-08 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 10 | @ UNC Asheville | L 75–78 | — | 29 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-11 | 2-5 | 5-6 |
| NOV 13 | @ Clemson | L 46–91 | GS | 22 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| NOV 18 | @ Saint Louis | L 69–83 | GS | 23 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-8 | 1-3 | 7-7 |
| NOV 24 | vs Georgia Southern | L 63–68 | — | 20 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 3-3 |
| NOV 28 | vs Bowling Green | L 58–67 | — | 13 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| DEC 2 | @ Elon | L 61–66 | — | 13 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| DEC 6 | @ Mercer | L 59–75 | — | 20 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| DEC 16 | @ UNC Greensboro | L 63–75 | — | 17 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
| DEC 21 | @ Northern Arizona | L 56–68 | — | 11 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| DEC 22 | @ Utah Valley | L 66–71 | — | 23 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 5-5 |
| DEC 29 | @ Cal State Fullerton | L 72–103 | — | 15 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| DEC 30 | @ Howard | W 67–62 | — | 22 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3-7 | 2-3 | 4-8 |
| JAN 4 | vs Western Carolina | W 64–60 | — | 17 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| JAN 5 | vs Chattanooga | L 60–77 | — | 27 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0-5 | 0-2 | 5-7 |
| JAN 11 | @ Western Carolina | L 65–73 | — | 20 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-2 | 4-4 |
| JAN 12 | vs Elon | L 58–60 | — | 23 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 17 | vs Davidson | L 51–73 | — | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JAN 19 | vs Charleston | W 74–66 | — | 17 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| JAN 25 | vs App State | L 66–84 | — | 19 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 2-4 |
| JAN 27 | @ Georgia Southern | L 53–62 | — | 18 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 4-6 |
| JAN 31 | vs The Citadel | W 53–51 | — | 14 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 2-4 |
| FEB 2 | @ Wofford | L 42–75 | — | 18 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| FEB 8 | @ Chattanooga | L 63–66 | — | 20 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| FEB 10 | vs UNC Greensboro | W 69–59 | — | 32 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5-13 | 1-3 | 7-7 |
| FEB 16 | @ Davidson | L 51–86 | GS | 25 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-7 | 3-3 | 3-4 |
| FEB 19 | vs Wofford | W 67–61 | — | 32 | 18 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6-10 | 2-3 | 4-6 |
| FEB 22 | @ App State | L 77–90 | — | 29 | 17 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6-13 | 0-3 | 5-5 |
| FEB 29 | @ The Citadel | W 73–63 | GS | 23 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-7 | 3-4 | 1-2 |
| MAR 1 | @ Charleston | L 59–77 | — | 34 | 23 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8-15 | 2-5 | 5-6 |
| MAR 7 | @ Elon | L 37–52 | — | 26 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1-9 | 0-2 | 6-6 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.