MARCUS STOUT
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Fordham | 29 | 975 | 438 | 15.1 | 71 | 85 | 29 | 0 | 69 | 152-379 | 40.1% | 73-210 | 34.8% | 72.6% |
| 2006-07 | Fordham | 30 | 988 | 460 | 15.3 | 95 | 78 | 49 | 4 | 61 | 157-368 | 42.7% | 74-196 | 37.8% | 66.1% |
| 2005-06 | Fordham | 32 | 991 | 417 | 13.0 | 97 | 91 | 36 | 0 | 84 | 146-356 | 41.0% | 48-127 | 37.8% | 77.0% |
| 2004-05 | Fordham | 25 | 782 | 351 | 14.0 | 81 | 67 | 32 | 4 | 89 | 114-294 | 38.8% | 59-165 | 35.8% | 79.0% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 116 | 3,736 | 1,666 | 14.4 | 344 | 321 | 146 | 8 | 303 | 569-1,397 | 40.7% | 254-698 | 36.4% | 73.3% |
02/2007-08 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 10 | @ Columbia | W 79–61 | GS | 32 | 21 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8-16 | 4-8 | 1-1 |
| NOV 12 | vs Central Missouri | W 76–47 | GS | 34 | 22 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7-14 | 2-7 | 6-7 |
| NOV 14 | @ Missouri | L 55–79 | GS | 31 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-12 | 2-6 | 3-4 |
| NOV 17 | @ Syracuse | L 63–80 | GS | 33 | 12 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4-13 | 4-10 | 0-0 |
| NOV 24 | vs Charleston | L 68–73 | GS | 37 | 19 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9-16 | 1-6 | 0-1 |
| NOV 29 | @ Manhattan | W 66–57 | — | 23 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
| DEC 2 | vs Robert Morris | L 66–72 | GS | 33 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-11 | 0-6 | 2-2 |
| DEC 6 | vs Hofstra | W 73–71 | — | 34 | 22 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8-12 | 4-7 | 2-3 |
| DEC 8 | vs NJIT | W 88–32 | — | 23 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6-9 | 3-5 | 1-2 |
| DEC 22 | vs UNC Greensboro | L 54–58 | GS | 29 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| DEC 29 | vs Binghamton | W 72–60 | — | 24 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-4 | 1-2 |
| DEC 31 | @ Georgetown | L 55–82 | — | 36 | 27 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8-16 | 6-11 | 5-7 |
| JAN 10 | @ Duquesne | L 62–74 | GS | 37 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2-11 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| JAN 12 | @ Xavier | L 50–68 | GS | 38 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 7-13 | 2-6 | 0-0 |
| JAN 17 | vs George Washington | W 66–53 | — | 40 | 23 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6-16 | 4-9 | 7-9 |
| JAN 19 | vs Duquesne | W 75–74 | GS | 35 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5-12 | 3-9 | 2-4 |
| JAN 27 | @ Charlotte | L 60–74 | GS | 38 | 15 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 6-15 | 2-7 | 1-2 |
| FEB 1 | vs Temple | L 50–58 | GS | 31 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-16 | 1-9 | 2-2 |
| FEB 2 | @ Saint Joseph's | L 55–70 | GS | 32 | 19 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6-15 | 3-8 | 4-4 |
| FEB 2 | @ Saint Joseph's | L 55–70 | GS | 32 | 19 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6-15 | 3-8 | 4-4 |
| FEB 10 | vs Rhode Island | L 63–65 | GS | 37 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-20 | 4-11 | 3-4 |
| FEB 15 | @ Massachusetts | W 76–72 | GS | 35 | 22 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7-15 | 3-8 | 5-5 |
| FEB 17 | vs Charlotte | W 53–51 | GS | 33 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3-11 | 0-2 | 3-4 |
| FEB 21 | @ Saint Louis | L 65–69 | — | 39 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-10 | 3-7 | 1-2 |
| FEB 23 | @ Temple | W 78–76 | — | 35 | 31 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10-15 | 5-9 | 6-9 |
| FEB 28 | vs La Salle | L 78–83 | GS | 36 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-14 | 3-11 | 1-1 |
| MAR 2 | vs Dayton | L 50–57 | GS | 32 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-13 | 3-7 | 0-0 |
| MAR 6 | @ Richmond | L 53–58 | GS | 35 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-11 | 2-7 | 0-0 |
| MAR 8 | vs St. Bonaventure | W 69–62 | GS | 40 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7-19 | 4-11 | 3-4 |
| MAR 12 | @ Saint Joseph's | L 62–80 | — | 33 | 13 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-15 | 2-9 | 1-2 |
| MAR 12 | @ Saint Joseph's | L 62–80 | — | 33 | 13 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-15 | 2-9 | 1-2 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.