ZAM FREDRICK
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | South Carolina | 30 | 965 | 469 | 15.6 | 81 | 56 | 25 | 2 | 74 | 161-404 | 39.9% | 61-161 | 37.9% | 67.2% |
| 2007-08 | South Carolina | 32 | 1,128 | 475 | 14.8 | 91 | 101 | 30 | 6 | 75 | 176-438 | 40.2% | 68-193 | 35.2% | 67.1% |
| 2005-06 | Georgia Tech | 28 | 807 | 298 | 10.6 | 71 | 110 | 25 | 1 | 97 | 110-273 | 40.3% | 28-87 | 32.2% | 74.6% |
| 2004-05 | Georgia Tech | 15 | 104 | 29 | 1.9 | 11 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 10-32 | 31.3% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 50.0% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 105 | 3,004 | 1,271 | 12.1 | 254 | 279 | 83 | 10 | 254 | 457-1,147 | 39.8% | 162-456 | 35.5% | 68.4% |
02/2008-09 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 15 | vs Jacksonville State | W 89–76 | GS | 21 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7-10 | 2-2 | 1-3 |
| NOV 16 | vs Winthrop | W 86–63 | GS | 25 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-13 | 3-7 | 3-4 |
| NOV 22 | vs South Carolina Upstate | W 75–53 | GS | 35 | 23 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9-15 | 3-6 | 2-2 |
| NOV 29 | @ Charleston | L 80–82 | GS | 42 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2-11 | 0-1 | 4-4 |
| DEC 3 | @ Princeton | W 84–58 | GS | 24 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7-11 | 2-4 | 4-5 |
| DEC 5 | vs Furman | W 72–48 | GS | 30 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-15 | 1-6 | 2-4 |
| DEC 17 | vs North Carolina Central | W 90–43 | GS | 26 | 18 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6-15 | 3-9 | 3-4 |
| DEC 20 | vs The Citadel | W 80–66 | GS | 23 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-12 | 1-4 | 7-8 |
| DEC 24 | vs Presbyterian | W 75–56 | GS | 33 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-12 | 0-4 | 2-5 |
| DEC 31 | vs Clemson | L 87–98 | GS | 39 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-18 | 2-5 | 3-4 |
| JAN 2 | @ Baylor | W 85–84 | GS | 35 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7-14 | 2-3 | 3-3 |
| JAN 6 | vs Wofford | W 78–61 | GS | 31 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-11 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| JAN 11 | vs Auburn | W 68–56 | GS | 37 | 27 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9-18 | 4-10 | 5-5 |
| JAN 15 | @ LSU | L 68–85 | GS | 32 | 18 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7-12 | 1-3 | 3-7 |
| JAN 17 | @ Tennessee | L 79–82 | GS | 31 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5-12 | 2-7 | 6-9 |
| JAN 22 | vs Florida | W 70–69 | GS | 36 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-15 | 2-5 | 3-8 |
| JAN 25 | vs Ole Miss | W 82–77 | GS | 34 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-14 | 0-3 | 1-4 |
| JAN 29 | vs Vanderbilt | W 86–76 | GS | 32 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-12 | 2-5 | 5-8 |
| JAN 31 | @ Kentucky | W 78–77 | GS | 36 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9-20 | 4-8 | 2-3 |
| FEB 4 | @ Florida | L 93–97 | GS | 33 | 17 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6-13 | 3-5 | 2-3 |
| FEB 7 | vs Georgia | W 79–68 | GS | 33 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 5-11 | 3-7 | 0-0 |
| FEB 14 | @ Alabama | W 75–73 | GS | 32 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 4-5 |
| FEB 19 | @ Mississippi State | L 70–75 | GS | 31 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-10 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| FEB 22 | vs Arkansas | W 82–78 | GS | 40 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-15 | 1-4 | 3-4 |
| FEB 26 | vs Kentucky | W 77–59 | GS | 28 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3-11 | 1-3 | 8-8 |
| MAR 1 | @ Vanderbilt | L 83–96 | GS | 37 | 21 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9-19 | 3-10 | 0-0 |
| MAR 6 | vs Tennessee | L 70–86 | GS | 31 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-12 | 4-9 | 2-5 |
| MAR 7 | @ Georgia | W 68–51 | GS | 31 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-13 | 4-5 | 1-2 |
| MAR 13 | vs Mississippi State | L 68–82 | — | 32 | 20 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7-15 | 3-7 | 3-4 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.