CLIFF HAMMONDS
01/Season by season
4 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Clemson | 33 | 1,130 | 380 | 11.5 | 134 | 131 | 64 | 7 | 60 | 146-311 | 46.9% | 60-154 | 39.0% | 45.9% |
| 2006-07 | Clemson | 29 | 962 | 346 | 11.9 | 94 | 121 | 45 | 5 | 45 | 126-265 | 47.5% | 60-158 | 38.0% | 65.4% |
| 2005-06 | Clemson | 28 | 827 | 275 | 9.8 | 93 | 92 | 48 | 6 | 49 | 104-257 | 40.5% | 40-145 | 27.6% | 55.1% |
| 2004-05 | Clemson | 30 | 905 | 290 | 9.7 | 109 | 87 | 42 | 6 | 58 | 102-245 | 41.6% | 50-149 | 33.6% | 64.3% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 4 seasons | 120 | 3,824 | 1,291 | 10.8 | 430 | 431 | 199 | 24 | 212 | 478-1,078 | 44.3% | 210-606 | 34.7% | 57.3% |
02/2005-06 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 22 | vs Coppin State | W 102–71 | — | 27 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-11 | 1-7 | 0-0 |
| NOV 24 | vs South Carolina State | W 79–38 | — | 21 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4-10 | 1-7 | 0-0 |
| DEC 3 | vs South Carolina | W 82–63 | GS | 31 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2-9 | 1-5 | 1-2 |
| DEC 7 | vs Wofford | W 62–60 | — | 26 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-5 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| DEC 10 | vs East Tennessee State | W 80–72 | — | 18 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8-14 | 5-10 | 0-0 |
| DEC 19 | @ Puerto Rico-Mayaguez | W 101–60 | — | 20 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4-7 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| DEC 20 | vs Holy Cross | W 71–48 | — | 31 | 15 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6-10 | 2-5 | 1-2 |
| DEC 21 | vs Akron | W 66–59 | — | 30 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| DEC 29 | @ Georgia | L 69–72 | GS | 23 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3-8 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| DEC 31 | vs Elon | L 69–74 | — | 31 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2-8 | 2-5 | 1-2 |
| JAN 5 | vs Florida State | W 61–55 | — | 23 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 2-4 |
| JAN 7 | @ Virginia | L 58–64 | GS | 33 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6-12 | 1-4 | 1-1 |
| JAN 12 | vs Wake Forest | W 74–73 | GS | 39 | 21 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7-14 | 4-10 | 3-5 |
| JAN 14 | vs Duke | L 77–87 | GS | 39 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5-12 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| JAN 19 | @ Miami | L 38–62 | — | 32 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1-8 | 0-6 | 0-0 |
| JAN 21 | @ Georgia Tech | W 73–63 | GS | 29 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0-5 | 0-2 | 1-3 |
| JAN 29 | vs NC State | L 85–94 | GS | 38 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3-9 | 1-6 | 4-10 |
| FEB 2 | @ Florida State | L 59–69 | — | 32 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5-11 | 1-6 | 0-0 |
| FEB 4 | @ North Carolina | L 61–76 | GS | 29 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-8 | 0-5 | 0-0 |
| FEB 9 | vs Virginia Tech | L 74–75 | — | 37 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3-8 | 1-4 | 1-2 |
| FEB 12 | @ Boston College | L 61–67 | GS | 28 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-11 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| FEB 15 | vs Maryland | W 89–77 | GS | 35 | 17 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 6-12 | 2-6 | 3-4 |
| FEB 23 | @ Wake Forest | L 68–74 | — | 36 | 15 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5-10 | 4-8 | 1-2 |
| FEB 25 | vs Virginia | W 90–64 | — | 22 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 2-2 |
| MAR 2 | @ Virginia Tech | W 86–81 | — | 32 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7-11 | 3-5 | 1-2 |
| MAR 4 | vs Georgia Tech | W 95–82 | — | 34 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 3-4 |
| MAR 9 | @ Miami | L 63–66 | — | 29 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-11 | 2-7 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.