DAVID HOSKINS
01/Season by season
2 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Kansas State | 32 | 864 | 455 | 14.2 | 192 | 80 | 30 | 7 | 84 | 140-318 | 44.0% | 11-55 | 20.0% | 74.9% |
| 2005-06 | Kansas State | 28 | 741 | 367 | 13.1 | 129 | 57 | 24 | 3 | 72 | 123-242 | 50.8% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 69.6% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 2 seasons | 60 | 1,605 | 822 | 13.7 | 321 | 137 | 54 | 10 | 156 | 263-560 | 47.0% | 13-66 | 19.7% | 72.6% |
02/2006-07 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 11 | vs William & Mary | W 69–60 | — | 30 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-15 | 1-7 | 6-9 |
| NOV 16 | @ Rutgers | W 51–41 | GS | 25 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-11 | 1-4 | 5-7 |
| NOV 19 | vs Tennessee Tech | W 99–79 | — | 32 | 27 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 8-14 | 1-4 | 10-13 |
| NOV 22 | @ New Mexico | L 54–78 | GS | 20 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| NOV 26 | vs Coppin State | W 65–57 | — | 25 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 3-7 |
| NOV 30 | @ California | L 48–78 | — | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| DEC 2 | @ Colorado State | L 81–84 | GS | 20 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| DEC 6 | vs Cleveland State | W 82–60 | — | 21 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6-9 | 0-1 | 5-6 |
| DEC 10 | @ North Dakota State | T 81–81 | GS | 21 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 8-13 |
| DEC 17 | vs Kennesaw State | W 78–54 | GS | 23 | 17 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 5-6 |
| DEC 23 | @ USC | W 68–55 | — | 26 | 19 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 9-10 |
| DEC 24 | vs New Mexico | W 72–56 | — | 22 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 3-4 |
| JAN 4 | @ Xavier | L 66–76 | — | 26 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5-11 | 0-1 | 7-8 |
| JAN 7 | @ Texas A&M | L 65–69 | GS | 31 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-10 | 1-3 | 6-7 |
| JAN 9 | vs Texas Tech | L 48–62 | GS | 33 | 23 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7-13 | 2-2 | 7-10 |
| JAN 13 | @ Missouri | W 85–81 | GS | 28 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3-8 | 0-1 | 12-12 |
| JAN 18 | vs Baylor | W 66–60 | — | 25 | 13 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-12 | 0-3 | 9-10 |
| JAN 20 | @ Iowa State | W 69–60 | — | 36 | 22 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9-18 | 0-2 | 4-6 |
| JAN 23 | vs Chicago State | W 69–36 | GS | 29 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7-17 | 0-2 | 1-2 |
| JAN 27 | vs Nebraska | W 61–45 | GS | 32 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 5-5 |
| FEB 1 | vs Missouri | W 78–73 | GS | 29 | 25 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7-14 | 1-2 | 10-12 |
| FEB 3 | @ Texas | L 69–72 | GS | 29 | 13 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-11 | 0-1 | 3-4 |
| FEB 8 | @ Kansas | L 70–97 | GS | 23 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4-9 | 2-4 | 3-6 |
| FEB 10 | vs Colorado | W 78–59 | GS | 28 | 13 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-13 | 0-2 | 5-11 |
| FEB 14 | @ Nebraska | L 63–74 | GS | 26 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
| FEB 17 | vs Iowa State | W 65–47 | GS | 36 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 6-10 | 0-1 | 8-9 |
| FEB 20 | vs Kansas | L 62–71 | GS | 32 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-15 | 0-2 | 5-5 |
| FEB 24 | @ Colorado | W 87–71 | GS | 31 | 21 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7-10 | 1-2 | 6-8 |
| FEB 28 | @ Oklahoma State | L 68–84 | — | 25 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8-10 | 1-1 | 3-4 |
| MAR 3 | vs Oklahoma | W 72–61 | GS | 25 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 6-10 |
| MAR 9 | vs Texas Tech | W 66–45 | GS | 30 | 8 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-10 | 0-2 | 4-7 |
| MAR 10 | @ Kansas | L 61–67 | GS | 35 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 3-9 | 0-1 | 2-4 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.