TOREY THOMAS
01/Season by season
3 seasons
| Season | Club | G | MIN | PTS | PPG | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Holy Cross | 32 | 1,199 | 437 | 13.7 | 154 | 155 | 88 | 0 | 128 | 123-318 | 38.7% | 47-115 | 40.9% | 77.0% |
| 2005-06 | Holy Cross | 32 | 1,166 | 353 | 11.0 | 168 | 153 | 77 | 1 | 86 | 114-291 | 39.2% | 34-96 | 35.4% | 67.9% |
| 2004-05 | Holy Cross | 24 | 575 | 169 | 7.0 | 90 | 84 | 41 | 0 | 38 | 57-139 | 41.0% | 11-37 | 29.7% | 68.8% |
| REGULAR SEASON TOTAL | 3 seasons | 88 | 2,940 | 959 | 10.9 | 412 | 392 | 206 | 1 | 252 | 294-748 | 39.3% | 92-248 | 37.1% | 72.5% |
02/2005-06 game log
Regular season
| Date | Opponent | Result | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV 18 | vs High Point | W 85–73 | — | 34 | 20 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 8-13 |
| NOV 20 | @ William & Mary | W 67–55 | — | 37 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4-10 | 0-2 | 7-10 |
| NOV 23 | vs Harvard | L 55–70 | — | 33 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 4-11 | 0-3 | 3-5 |
| NOV 26 | @ Cincinnati | L 55–77 | — | 33 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 3-4 |
| NOV 29 | @ Vermont | L 64–68 | — | 25 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| DEC 2 | @ Siena | L 63–68 | — | 40 | 5 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-2 | 3-3 |
| DEC 4 | vs Fordham | W 71–63 | — | 50 | 23 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6-14 | 3-7 | 8-12 |
| DEC 8 | vs Brown | W 64–41 | — | 30 | 5 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2-8 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| DEC 19 | vs Chattanooga | W 82–65 | — | 40 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 4-6 |
| DEC 20 | @ Clemson | L 48–71 | — | 35 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-8 | 0-2 | 3-4 |
| DEC 21 | vs Mississippi State | L 75–76 | — | 40 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5-7 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| DEC 28 | @ George Mason | L 38–71 | — | 38 | 16 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7-13 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| DEC 30 | @ Northeastern | W 59–44 | — | 39 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 2-9 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| JAN 3 | vs Boston University | W 57–55 | — | 40 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 5-13 | 3-6 | 1-2 |
| JAN 7 | vs Lafayette | W 86–57 | — | 34 | 18 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8-13 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| JAN 12 | @ Army | W 84–46 | — | 35 | 16 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5-9 | 2-4 | 4-4 |
| JAN 14 | @ Bucknell | L 42–56 | — | 40 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2-11 | 2-5 | 4-6 |
| JAN 18 | vs Boston College | L 53–63 | GS | 40 | 16 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-10 | 3-4 | 3-4 |
| JAN 21 | vs American University | W 74–63 | — | 31 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 3-4 |
| JAN 26 | vs Colgate | W 60–42 | — | 38 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2-10 | 0-3 | 4-4 |
| JAN 29 | @ Lehigh | L 63–64 | — | 33 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 5-13 | 1-5 | 1-2 |
| FEB 2 | @ Navy | W 81–67 | — | 39 | 13 | 8 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 4-10 | 2-4 | 3-4 |
| FEB 4 | @ Lafayette | W 77–61 | — | 40 | 13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4-10 | 1-2 | 4-9 |
| FEB 9 | vs Army | W 88–38 | — | 31 | 21 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7-11 | 4-6 | 3-3 |
| FEB 11 | vs Bucknell | L 52–57 | — | 40 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1-11 | 0-4 | 3-4 |
| FEB 16 | vs Navy | W 72–62 | — | 39 | 14 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 5-11 | 0-3 | 4-4 |
| FEB 18 | @ American University | W 69–62 | — | 40 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-7 | 0-3 | 2-2 |
| FEB 23 | @ Colgate | W 62–56 | — | 40 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 6-10 |
| FEB 26 | vs Lehigh | W 68–54 | — | 30 | 15 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-11 | 4-6 | 1-2 |
| MAR 4 | vs Navy | W 78–50 | — | 37 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2-9 | 0-3 | 2-3 |
| MAR 5 | vs Lehigh | W 73–66 | — | 40 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-8 | 0-3 | 3-8 |
| MAR 10 | @ Bucknell | L 59–74 | GS | 25 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
The club shown beside the name is the one this player last recorded a box score for, taken from the stat rows rather than from the player table, because a college roster turns over every year and that column holds only the last club the loader saw. Win and loss are derived from the fixture’s own final score and the side the player was on, not read from the stat row, whose result column is empty on all 2,499,568 college basketball rows; a game whose fixture has no score reads “no result on record”. Three-point figures read two spellings of the same key, so games from one early import are counted rather than reported as zero. A player’s season line is the sum of his box scores, so a game the source never published is missing from it rather than counted as a zero.